Plasma <i>p</i> ‐tau changes across the clinical spectrum of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) plasma biomarkers have transformed the field due to their scalability and minimal invasiveness, especially when evidence of AD biomarker abnormality is required for novel anti‐amyloid immunotherapies. Among plasma biomarker candidates, phosphorylated tau ( p ‐tau) variants show most promise for clinical application. While establishing cutoffs is crucial for implementation, understanding continuous‐level changes is critical for accurate interpretation in research and clinical settings. Given the variety of p ‐tau biomarkers and emerging assays, robust estimates of continuous‐level plasma p ‐tau changes across the clinical spectrum of AD are needed. Method We screened databases for studies (01‐Jul‐1984 to 09‐Dec‐2024) reporting plasma p ‐tau concentrations alongside Aβ‐PET, CSF biomarkers, or neuropathology. Plasma p ‐tau fold‐changes across the AD clinical spectrum were assessed in two analyses: i) from CU Aβ‐ to CU Aβ+, MCI Aβ+, and Aβ+ dementia and (ii) CI Aβ‐positive vs. CI Aβ‐negative. Random‐effects models using the ratio of means method estimated fold‐change effect sizes. This PRISMA‐compliant study was pre‐registered (PROSPERO‐ID: CRD42023422143). Result Of 2112 titles screened, 71 studies were included in this preliminary analysis. Plasma p ‐tau217 showed a stepwise increase across the AD clinical spectrum, increasing 2.17‐fold (95%CI 1.98–2.37) in CU Aβ‐positive ( n = 1451), 3.16‐fold (95%CI 2.84–3.52) in MCI Aβ‐positive ( n = 1185), and 4.95‐fold (95%CI 4.18–5.87) in Aβ‐positive dementia ( n = 925) compared with CU Aβ‐negative ( n = 3973) (Figure 1). When comparing Aβ‐positive CI vs. Aβ‐negative CI individuals, p ‐tau217 increased nearly twice as much (3.58‐fold, 95%CI 3.25–3.93; n = 5995) compared to p ‐tau181 (1.71‐fold, 95%CI 1.61–1.82; n = 8342) and p ‐tau231 (1.71‐fold, 95%CI 1.53–1.90; n = 1019) (Figure 2), and similar to p ‐tau217/np‐tau217 (%p‐tau217: 3.59‐fold, 95%CI 2.74‐4.71; n = 1019). Effect size summaries for each p ‐tau variant across analyses are shown in Figure 3. Sensitivity analyses preserving only the median‐performing assay in head‐to‐head studies led to similar results. Conclusion P ‐tau217 is the plasma biomarker with the largest dynamic range across the entire clinical AD spectrum, with its large AD‐related effect sizes in symptomatic patients making it a robust candidate for clinical implementation. Results do not demonstrate any consistent superiority of %p‐tau217 over p ‐tau217, but few studies used the ratio. Data extraction is ongoing until March/2025. A paired diagnostic accuracy meta‐analysis was also submitted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_106492
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma p ‐tau changes across the clinical spectrum of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

K. Blennow, Wagner S. Brum, Michael Schöll, Lydia Trudel et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Plasma p ‐tau changes across the clinical spectrum of Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

K. Blennow, Wagner S. Brum, Michael Schöll, Lydia Trudel, Chloë Witherow, Martin Nakouzi, Alexis Moscoso, Przemyslaw Radoslaw Kac, Arthur Macedo, Henrik Zetterberg, Fernando Bittemcourt, Eduardo R. Zimmer, Joseph Therriault, Ilaria Pola, Matthew Wong, Andrea L. Benedet, Nicholas J. Ashton, Pedro Rosa‐Neto, Thomas K Karikari
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Alzheimer's disease (AD) plasma biomarkers have transformed the field due to their scalability and minimal invasiveness, especially when evidence of AD biomarker abnormality is required for novel anti‐amyloid immunotherapies. Among plasma biomarker candidates, phosphorylated tau ( p ‐tau) variants show most promise for clinical application. While establishing cutoffs is crucial for implementation, understanding continuous‐level changes is critical for accurate interpretation in research and clinical settings. Given the variety of p ‐tau biomarkers and emerging assays, robust estimates of continuous‐level plasma p ‐tau changes across the clinical spectrum of AD are needed. Method We screened databases for studies (01‐Jul‐1984 to 09‐Dec‐2024) reporting plasma p ‐tau concentrations alongside Aβ‐PET, CSF biomarkers, or neuropathology. Plasma p ‐tau fold‐changes across the AD clinical spectrum were assessed in two analyses: i) from CU Aβ‐ to CU Aβ+, MCI Aβ+, and Aβ+ dementia and (ii) CI Aβ‐positive vs. CI Aβ‐negative. Random‐effects models using the ratio of means method estimated fold‐change effect sizes. This PRISMA‐compliant study was pre‐registered (PROSPERO‐ID: CRD42023422143). Result Of 2112 titles screened, 71 studies were included in this preliminary analysis. Plasma p ‐tau217 showed a stepwise increase across the AD clinical spectrum, increasing 2.17‐fold (95%CI 1.98–2.37) in CU Aβ‐positive ( n = 1451), 3.16‐fold (95%CI 2.84–3.52) in MCI Aβ‐positive ( n = 1185), and 4.95‐fold (95%CI 4.18–5.87) in Aβ‐positive dementia ( n = 925) compared with CU Aβ‐negative ( n = 3973) (Figure 1). When comparing Aβ‐positive CI vs. Aβ‐negative CI individuals, p ‐tau217 increased nearly twice as much (3.58‐fold, 95%CI 3.25–3.93; n = 5995) compared to p ‐tau181 (1.71‐fold, 95%CI 1.61–1.82; n = 8342) and p ‐tau231 (1.71‐fold, 95%CI 1.53–1.90; n = 1019) (Figure 2), and similar to p ‐tau217/np‐tau217 (%p‐tau217: 3.59‐fold, 95%CI 2.74‐4.71; n = 1019). Effect size summaries for each p ‐tau variant across analyses are shown in Figure 3. Sensitivity analyses preserving only the median‐performing assay in head‐to‐head studies led to similar results. Conclusion P ‐tau217 is the plasma biomarker with the largest dynamic range across the entire clinical AD spectrum, with its large AD‐related effect sizes in symptomatic patients making it a robust candidate for clinical implementation. Results do not demonstrate any consistent superiority of %p‐tau217 over p ‐tau217, but few studies used the ratio. Data extraction is ongoing until March/2025. A paired diagnostic accuracy meta‐analysis was also submitted.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), University of Pittsburgh (US), Aarhus University (DK), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (ES), Banner Alzheimer’s Institute, McGill University (CA), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.