A fluid–structure interaction framework for mechanical aortic valves: analyzing the effects of valve design and aortic curvature on hemodynamics

Aortic mechanical heart valves (MHVs) have been implanted for decades to treat aortic valve disease and remain a viable option when valve durability is prioritized. However, the non-physiological hemodynamics induced by MHVs may lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations enable the analysis of the biomechanical interaction between MHVs and blood flow. This study presents a strongly coupled, boundary-fitted FSI framework for aortic MHVs, used to assess the impact of MHV design and aortic curvature on hemodynamics. Nine simulation scenarios were investigated, considering three commercially available MHVs and three idealized aortic geometries (one straight and two curved models). Overall, the framework proved to provide results for flow-rate waveforms, velocity fields, and leaflet kinematics aligning well with previous experimental and computational studies. The framework highlighted that: (i) MHV design influences velocity fields and large-scale vorticity transport in the aorta, with systolic differences among the three devices of up to 41% and 133% in average swirling strength and stretching, respectively; (ii) the straight aortic model underestimates systolic swirling strength (up to 56%) and stretching (up to 91%) compared to curved models. This FSI framework can support MHV development by analyzing different device designs and anatomical scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Engineering & Physics
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1873-4030/ae1e76
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A fluid–structure interaction framework for mechanical aortic valves: analyzing the effects of valve design and aortic curvature on hemodynamics

Umberto Morbiducci, Valentina Mazzi, Dario Carbonaro, Claudio Chiastra et al.
Medical Engineering & Physics
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

A fluid–structure interaction framework for mechanical aortic valves: analyzing the effects of valve design and aortic curvature on hemodynamics

Umberto Morbiducci, Valentina Mazzi, Dario Carbonaro, Claudio Chiastra, Karol Calò, Mariachiara Arminio, Facundo Del Pin, Diego Gallo, Rodrigo Paz
article en

Abstract

Aortic mechanical heart valves (MHVs) have been implanted for decades to treat aortic valve disease and remain a viable option when valve durability is prioritized. However, the non-physiological hemodynamics induced by MHVs may lead to adverse clinical outcomes. Fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations enable the analysis of the biomechanical interaction between MHVs and blood flow. This study presents a strongly coupled, boundary-fitted FSI framework for aortic MHVs, used to assess the impact of MHV design and aortic curvature on hemodynamics. Nine simulation scenarios were investigated, considering three commercially available MHVs and three idealized aortic geometries (one straight and two curved models). Overall, the framework proved to provide results for flow-rate waveforms, velocity fields, and leaflet kinematics aligning well with previous experimental and computational studies. The framework highlighted that: (i) MHV design influences velocity fields and large-scale vorticity transport in the aorta, with systolic differences among the three devices of up to 41% and 133% in average swirling strength and stretching, respectively; (ii) the straight aortic model underestimates systolic swirling strength (up to 56%) and stretching (up to 91%) compared to curved models. This FSI framework can support MHV development by analyzing different device designs and anatomical scenarios.

Medical Engineering & PhysicsVol. 147(1)
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Politecnico di Torino (IT), Ansys (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.