Whose Knowledge Counts? Decolonial and Anticolonial Reckonings in STEM Education

Globally, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is widely framed as essential to innovation, economic growth, and social progress. These framings, however, often overlook STEM’s long-standing connections to colonialism, empire, and the exclusion of certain forms of knowledge. Decolonial and anticolonial perspectives are used to examine the assumptions about knowledge and reality that shape STEM education. While STEM education has played an important role in scientific and technological development, it has also reinforced hierarchies that marginalize Black, Indigenous, and other non-Western scientific traditions. These hierarchies persist through curriculum design, ideas about ability, language dominance, and universalist practices that treat Euro-Western science as neutral and authoritative. Bringing decoloniality and anticoloniality into conversation makes visible how STEM education has helped sustain exclusionary knowledge systems and colonial ways of knowing. Four recurring myths are identified that continue to structure STEM education and limit possibilities for meaningful change. Rethinking STEM education along these lines is necessary to support epistemic justice and to open space for more plural, relational, and equitable futures. Keywords: decoloniality; anticoloniality; STEM education; epistemic justice; coloniality

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
Published
2025-12-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24908/encounters.v26i0.19612
Primary Topic
African cultural and philosophical studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Whose Knowledge Counts? Decolonial and Anticolonial Reckonings in STEM Education

Kenneth Gyamerah
Encounters in Theory and History of Education
African cultural and philosophical studies
article

Whose Knowledge Counts? Decolonial and Anticolonial Reckonings in STEM Education

Kenneth Gyamerah
article en

Abstract

Globally, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education is widely framed as essential to innovation, economic growth, and social progress. These framings, however, often overlook STEM’s long-standing connections to colonialism, empire, and the exclusion of certain forms of knowledge. Decolonial and anticolonial perspectives are used to examine the assumptions about knowledge and reality that shape STEM education. While STEM education has played an important role in scientific and technological development, it has also reinforced hierarchies that marginalize Black, Indigenous, and other non-Western scientific traditions. These hierarchies persist through curriculum design, ideas about ability, language dominance, and universalist practices that treat Euro-Western science as neutral and authoritative. Bringing decoloniality and anticoloniality into conversation makes visible how STEM education has helped sustain exclusionary knowledge systems and colonial ways of knowing. Four recurring myths are identified that continue to structure STEM education and limit possibilities for meaningful change. Rethinking STEM education along these lines is necessary to support epistemic justice and to open space for more plural, relational, and equitable futures. Keywords: decoloniality; anticoloniality; STEM education; epistemic justice; coloniality

Encounters in Theory and History of EducationVol. 26
Ontario Tech University (CA), Abiola Ajimobi Technical University Ibadan (NG)
University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
African cultural and philosophical studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.