Design trade-offs for residential retail tariffs and virtual power plants

Retail rate design and virtual power plants (VPPs) have the potential to shift customer electricity demand and provide economic benefits to utility customers. As the adoption of distributed energy resources (DERs) and flexible loads increases, retail tariff and program design can impact Bonbright's rate design principles including affordability, fairness, and economic efficiency. We model the effects of residential retail rates and VPP programs on power system costs in Massachusetts under a potential future system with high renewable energy and DER adoption. We model interactions among retail rate design, demand flexibility, and utility costs and identify trade-offs across different rate designs and VPP programs. We estimate that time-of-use (TOU) rates and VPP programs designed to avoid critical peak rates can lower overall system costs by 3.5 %–4.8 %. These lower costs translate to lower electricity bills for 62 %–91 % of customers, depending on the scenario. Although TOU rates with a critical peak VPP program can benefit all customer segments and are economically efficient, a VPP program with flat rates leads to the lowest overall bills for customers. We find that customers with loads that align with peak demand and who participate in critical peak VPP programs can underpay for their contribution to utility costs and shift costs to other customers. While our assumptions about mandatory TOU and/or critical peak pricing likely impact the magnitude of the results, the results highlight the trade-offs of these tariffs and programs and the importance of tariff and program design as demand becomes more flexible and responsive. • Price-responsive customers can shift costs to less flexible customers. • Time-varying rates and VPPs can lower system costs and energy bills. • DER growth can increase cost shifting between adopting and non-adopting customers. • Comprehensive rate design balances economic efficiency against other priorities. • Novel model linkages enable exploration of customer response to retail rate design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Energy
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.127339
Primary Topic
Smart Grid Energy Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Design trade-offs for residential retail tariffs and virtual power plants

Thomas Bowen, Rory McIlmoil, Christina Simeone, Andrew Alberg et al.
Applied Energy
Smart Grid Energy Management
article

Design trade-offs for residential retail tariffs and virtual power plants

Thomas Bowen, Rory McIlmoil, Christina Simeone, Andrew Alberg, Ellie Estreich, Michael Blonsky
article en

Abstract

Retail rate design and virtual power plants (VPPs) have the potential to shift customer electricity demand and provide economic benefits to utility customers. As the adoption of distributed energy resources (DERs) and flexible loads increases, retail tariff and program design can impact Bonbright's rate design principles including affordability, fairness, and economic efficiency. We model the effects of residential retail rates and VPP programs on power system costs in Massachusetts under a potential future system with high renewable energy and DER adoption. We model interactions among retail rate design, demand flexibility, and utility costs and identify trade-offs across different rate designs and VPP programs. We estimate that time-of-use (TOU) rates and VPP programs designed to avoid critical peak rates can lower overall system costs by 3.5 %–4.8 %. These lower costs translate to lower electricity bills for 62 %–91 % of customers, depending on the scenario. Although TOU rates with a critical peak VPP program can benefit all customer segments and are economically efficient, a VPP program with flat rates leads to the lowest overall bills for customers. We find that customers with loads that align with peak demand and who participate in critical peak VPP programs can underpay for their contribution to utility costs and shift costs to other customers. While our assumptions about mandatory TOU and/or critical peak pricing likely impact the magnitude of the results, the results highlight the trade-offs of these tariffs and programs and the importance of tariff and program design as demand becomes more flexible and responsive. • Price-responsive customers can shift costs to less flexible customers. • Time-varying rates and VPPs can lower system costs and energy bills. • DER growth can increase cost shifting between adopting and non-adopting customers. • Comprehensive rate design balances economic efficiency against other priorities. • Novel model linkages enable exploration of customer response to retail rate design.

Applied EnergyVol. 407
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Smart Grid Energy Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.