Real‐Life plasma GFAP Application using Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay in an expanded Cohort

Abstract Background The AA 2024 revised diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) included plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (pGFAP) as a key blood biomarker of inflammation in AD. This underscores the need for real‐world validation and targeted studies to better understand its clinical utility and application. We previously validated pGFAP's diagnostic utility for AD using a low‐cost chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA; Alinity i, Abbott, US) (AAIC2024). Now, we aim to assess its practical application in a larger, real‐world memory clinic cohort. Method From February 2023 to May 2024, core AD CSF biomarkers were obtained as the diagnostic workup of 109 subjects. Mixed ratios Aß42/40 and/or p ‐tau181/Aß42 were used for AD diagnosis. pGFAP was simultaneously determined using CMIA. Four patients were excluded due to confounding factors increasing pGFAP levels. Clinical and neuroimage evaluations were collected. Result We analyzed 105 patients (age 74 years [IQR 70‐78], female 60%, pGFAP 47 pg/mL [IQR 37‐75], MMSE 25.5 [IQR 23.0‐27.0]). Seventy patients were classified as AD (40 MCI, 30 dementia) and 35 as non‐AD (FTD, LBD, vascular and other), with no significant differences in age, sex or MMSE. pGFAP was higher in the AD group (62 pg/mL [IQR 44, 75] vs 31 pg/mL [IQR 20, 37], p <0.001). Age, but not sex, was associated with elevated pGFAP ( p = 0.030). Results remained significant after adjusting for covariates. In this real‐life cohort, pre‐test probability for AD was high (approximately 67%). ROC analysis for pGFAP yielded an AUC of 0.90 (CI 0.85‐0.96). Optimal threshold was 43 pg/mL (77% Sensitivity, 94% Specificity, 97% positive predictive value (PPV)). Additionally, pGFAP levels were marginally higher in AD dementia compared to AD MCI (66.3 [IQR 39.8, 75.3] vs. 42.9 [IQR 31.4, 58.6], p = 0.049). Conclusion Our results support pGFAP's diagnostic utility in distinguishing AD from non‐AD in routine clinical settings with high AD prevalence, being also consistent with its probable association with disease severity. These findings validate and extend our previous results, suggesting the potential for widespread use of pGFAP to enable earlier, more accurate, and cost‐effective AD detection in clinical practice. However, multicenter studies with larger, diverse cohorts are needed to validate its broader applicability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_104878
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real‐Life plasma GFAP Application using Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay in an expanded Cohort

M. Mesquida, E. Bargay Pizarro, L. Núñez Santos, M. Santes Berto et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Real‐Life plasma GFAP Application using Chemiluminescent Microparticle Immunoassay in an expanded Cohort

M. Mesquida, E. Bargay Pizarro, L. Núñez Santos, M. Santes Berto, Ana García Martin, Susana Tarongi Sanchez, Marian Vives Crook, Guillermo Amer Ferrer, Daniel Morell García
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The AA 2024 revised diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer's disease (AD) included plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein (pGFAP) as a key blood biomarker of inflammation in AD. This underscores the need for real‐world validation and targeted studies to better understand its clinical utility and application. We previously validated pGFAP's diagnostic utility for AD using a low‐cost chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA; Alinity i, Abbott, US) (AAIC2024). Now, we aim to assess its practical application in a larger, real‐world memory clinic cohort. Method From February 2023 to May 2024, core AD CSF biomarkers were obtained as the diagnostic workup of 109 subjects. Mixed ratios Aß42/40 and/or p ‐tau181/Aß42 were used for AD diagnosis. pGFAP was simultaneously determined using CMIA. Four patients were excluded due to confounding factors increasing pGFAP levels. Clinical and neuroimage evaluations were collected. Result We analyzed 105 patients (age 74 years [IQR 70‐78], female 60%, pGFAP 47 pg/mL [IQR 37‐75], MMSE 25.5 [IQR 23.0‐27.0]). Seventy patients were classified as AD (40 MCI, 30 dementia) and 35 as non‐AD (FTD, LBD, vascular and other), with no significant differences in age, sex or MMSE. pGFAP was higher in the AD group (62 pg/mL [IQR 44, 75] vs 31 pg/mL [IQR 20, 37], p <0.001). Age, but not sex, was associated with elevated pGFAP ( p = 0.030). Results remained significant after adjusting for covariates. In this real‐life cohort, pre‐test probability for AD was high (approximately 67%). ROC analysis for pGFAP yielded an AUC of 0.90 (CI 0.85‐0.96). Optimal threshold was 43 pg/mL (77% Sensitivity, 94% Specificity, 97% positive predictive value (PPV)). Additionally, pGFAP levels were marginally higher in AD dementia compared to AD MCI (66.3 [IQR 39.8, 75.3] vs. 42.9 [IQR 31.4, 58.6], p = 0.049). Conclusion Our results support pGFAP's diagnostic utility in distinguishing AD from non‐AD in routine clinical settings with high AD prevalence, being also consistent with its probable association with disease severity. These findings validate and extend our previous results, suggesting the potential for widespread use of pGFAP to enable earlier, more accurate, and cost‐effective AD detection in clinical practice. However, multicenter studies with larger, diverse cohorts are needed to validate its broader applicability.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Health Research Institute of the Balearic Islands (ES), Hospital Universitario Son Espases (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.