Positional comparison of countermovement jump performance in American collegiate football athletes

Purpose The purpose of this investigation was to examine countermovement jump differences between positional groups in American football. Methods 85 Division I collegiate football players were assigned to one of three groups (lineman = 32, midskill = 29, skill = 24). Each participant performed three CMJ trials using a portable force platform. A one-way analysis of variance was performed on all variables of interest. An a priori significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all analysis. Results Significant differences were present across all three groups for jump height ( p < 0.01) and RSImod ( p < 0.001) with the skill group having the highest values and the linemen having the lowest. Inversely, take-off momentum and body mass were the greatest in the linemen group with the lowest being the skill group ( p < 0.001). Linemen had longer duration in the propulsive phase ( p < 0.01), braking phase ( p < 0.01), and time to take off ( p < 0.01). Conclusions The differences between groups can aid in the design of training programs targeting specific traits for each positional group. Additionally, differences in positional metrics of interest may exist when using the CMJ to monitor fatigue status over the course of a competitive season.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251410902
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Positional comparison of countermovement jump performance in American collegiate football athletes

Shelby A. Peel, Paul T. Donahue, Leslie W. Oglesby, Juliana Moore
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Sports Performance and Training
article

Positional comparison of countermovement jump performance in American collegiate football athletes

Shelby A. Peel, Paul T. Donahue, Leslie W. Oglesby, Juliana Moore
article en

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this investigation was to examine countermovement jump differences between positional groups in American football. Methods 85 Division I collegiate football players were assigned to one of three groups (lineman = 32, midskill = 29, skill = 24). Each participant performed three CMJ trials using a portable force platform. A one-way analysis of variance was performed on all variables of interest. An a priori significance level of p < 0.05 was used for all analysis. Results Significant differences were present across all three groups for jump height ( p < 0.01) and RSImod ( p < 0.001) with the skill group having the highest values and the linemen having the lowest. Inversely, take-off momentum and body mass were the greatest in the linemen group with the lowest being the skill group ( p < 0.001). Linemen had longer duration in the propulsive phase ( p < 0.01), braking phase ( p < 0.01), and time to take off ( p < 0.01). Conclusions The differences between groups can aid in the design of training programs targeting specific traits for each positional group. Additionally, differences in positional metrics of interest may exist when using the CMJ to monitor fatigue status over the course of a competitive season.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
University of Southern Mississippi (US), University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Positional comparison of countermovement jump performance in American collegiate football athletes — Shelby A. Peel, Paul T. Donahue, et al. · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS