Racial and Ethnic Differences in White Matter Hyperintensity Burden: The Role of Vascular Risk Factors

Abstract Background A critical pathological marker observed in the aging brain is white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). WMHs are associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline, progression to mild cognitive impairment, and development of dementia. Vascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and elevated body mass index are well known contributors to WMH burden and independently increase the risk of dementia. These risk factors are disproportionately prevalent in racially diverse populations. However, the role of vascular risk factors in explaining WMH differences is not well understood in racially and ethnically diverse populations. This study examined whether race and ethnicity influence WMH burden and whether vascular risk factors explain these differences. Method Clinical and MRI data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) included 7,132 Whites, 892 Blacks, 283 Asians, 8307 non‐Hispanics, and 661 Hispanics. Baseline and longitudinal WMHs (Figure 1) were examined using linear regression and mixed‐effects models across racial and ethnic groups, controlling for demographics and vascular risk factors. Result At baseline, significant WMH burden differences were found between Black vs White older adults in total, frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital regions ( t ranging between 2.07–5.29, p <0.001). After adjusting for vascular risk factors, WMH burden differences were reduced in total, frontal, parietal, and occipital regions ( t ranging between 3.58‐4.37, p <0.001) and eliminated in temporal regions ( t = 1.76, p = 0.08). In the longitudinal dataset, when comparing Hispanics to non‐Hispanics, significant differences in total WMH burden were found only after adjusting for vascular risk factors ( t = 2.00, p = 0.04). No significant WMH burden differences were observed between Asian and White participants at baseline or longitudinally ( p >0.05). See Figure 2 (total WMH volume) and 3 (total and regional WMH volume) for median t‐statistics from the WMH analyses. Conclusion Vascular risk factors contribute to some of the racial WMH burden differences between Black and White older adults. The reverse effect was observed in Hispanic vs non‐Hispanic populations, with addition of vascular risk factors revealing ethnic group differences. These findings highlight the importance of exploring how the interaction between risk factors and race/ethnicity contributes to brain changes in the aging population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_106667
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial and Ethnic Differences in White Matter Hyperintensity Burden: The Role of Vascular Risk Factors

Farooq Kamal, Cassandra Morrison, Mahsa Dadar, Roqaie Moqadam
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Racial and Ethnic Differences in White Matter Hyperintensity Burden: The Role of Vascular Risk Factors

Farooq Kamal, Cassandra Morrison, Mahsa Dadar, Roqaie Moqadam
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background A critical pathological marker observed in the aging brain is white matter hyperintensities (WMHs). WMHs are associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline, progression to mild cognitive impairment, and development of dementia. Vascular risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and elevated body mass index are well known contributors to WMH burden and independently increase the risk of dementia. These risk factors are disproportionately prevalent in racially diverse populations. However, the role of vascular risk factors in explaining WMH differences is not well understood in racially and ethnically diverse populations. This study examined whether race and ethnicity influence WMH burden and whether vascular risk factors explain these differences. Method Clinical and MRI data from the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center (NACC) included 7,132 Whites, 892 Blacks, 283 Asians, 8307 non‐Hispanics, and 661 Hispanics. Baseline and longitudinal WMHs (Figure 1) were examined using linear regression and mixed‐effects models across racial and ethnic groups, controlling for demographics and vascular risk factors. Result At baseline, significant WMH burden differences were found between Black vs White older adults in total, frontal, temporal, parietal and occipital regions ( t ranging between 2.07–5.29, p <0.001). After adjusting for vascular risk factors, WMH burden differences were reduced in total, frontal, parietal, and occipital regions ( t ranging between 3.58‐4.37, p <0.001) and eliminated in temporal regions ( t = 1.76, p = 0.08). In the longitudinal dataset, when comparing Hispanics to non‐Hispanics, significant differences in total WMH burden were found only after adjusting for vascular risk factors ( t = 2.00, p = 0.04). No significant WMH burden differences were observed between Asian and White participants at baseline or longitudinally ( p >0.05). See Figure 2 (total WMH volume) and 3 (total and regional WMH volume) for median t‐statistics from the WMH analyses. Conclusion Vascular risk factors contribute to some of the racial WMH burden differences between Black and White older adults. The reverse effect was observed in Hispanic vs non‐Hispanic populations, with addition of vascular risk factors revealing ethnic group differences. These findings highlight the importance of exploring how the interaction between risk factors and race/ethnicity contributes to brain changes in the aging population.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Douglas Mental Health University Institute (CA), McGill University (CA), Carleton University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.