A proactive approach to ergonomics: an evaluation of multi-method risk assessment in warehouse operations

The proactive use of ergonomic assessment methods enhances worker performance and health while improving task quality and reducing operational costs through human-centred work design. This study was conducted in a logistics warehouse, where 197 tasks across nine locations were evaluated using REBA, RULA, BAuA, and LMM-ZS. Data were collected through on-site observations and task-specific video recordings. Risk scores were normalised to a 0-100 scale to enable cross-method comparison. Multi-method evaluations create two main challenges: selecting the most suitable method for each task and integrating outcomes derived from incompatible scales. To address these issues, a harmonised framework is proposed that standardises score ranges and categorical zones across the four methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ergonomics
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2025.2608270
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A proactive approach to ergonomics: an evaluation of multi-method risk assessment in warehouse operations

Derya İDE, Tülin Yıldız Gündüz, Sonnur Korkmaz, Oguzhan Ugurtay
Ergonomics
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

A proactive approach to ergonomics: an evaluation of multi-method risk assessment in warehouse operations

Derya İDE, Tülin Yıldız Gündüz, Sonnur Korkmaz, Oguzhan Ugurtay
article en

Abstract

The proactive use of ergonomic assessment methods enhances worker performance and health while improving task quality and reducing operational costs through human-centred work design. This study was conducted in a logistics warehouse, where 197 tasks across nine locations were evaluated using REBA, RULA, BAuA, and LMM-ZS. Data were collected through on-site observations and task-specific video recordings. Risk scores were normalised to a 0-100 scale to enable cross-method comparison. Multi-method evaluations create two main challenges: selecting the most suitable method for each task and integrating outcomes derived from incompatible scales. To address these issues, a harmonised framework is proposed that standardises score ranges and categorical zones across the four methods.

Ergonomics
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ (TR), Bursa Technical University (TR), Oral Health Solutions (United States) (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.