The role of climate and migration concerns in shaping personal economic insecurity in European societies

This study investigates how perceptions of societal threats, specifically climate change and migration, influence subjective economic insecurity across eleven European countries (Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Finland, France, Hungary, Iceland, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom). The selection of countries was based on data availability within the European Social Survey (ESS) ERIC CRONOS-3 Wave 2 survey design. Nonetheless, the sample reflects significant institutional diversity across welfare regimes, labour market structures, and political discourse environments: Nordic social-democratic regimes; continental corporatist systems; post-socialist transitions; and liberal-leaning contexts. We formulate a composite measure of economic insecurity that encompasses concerns about maintaining living standards, managing financial shocks, and future economic prospects. Perceived climate and migration threats are operationalised as separate multi-item indices. Results reveal that both threat domains independently increase economic insecurity, controlling for income, age, education, and gender. Interaction models demonstrate systematic variation across socioeconomic strata, with lower-income and less-educated groups exhibiting heightened sensitivity to threat perceptions. Cross-national analysis shows substantial variation, suggesting that institutional contexts—particularly welfare state architectures and political discourse environments—moderate how macro-level concerns translate into personal economic assessments. These findings advance affective political economy by demonstrating spillover mechanisms linking societal threats to economic self-evaluations. Policy implications are twofold: targeted social protection should bolster resilience among vulnerable groups, while broader efforts should reframe climate and migration as collective challenges focused on adaptation rather than threats. This includes strengthening trust in institutions and ensuring universal, predictable guarantees that restore a sense of control and shared efficacy. • A dual-level model explains subjective economic insecurity in Europe • Societal threat perceptions increase perceived economic vulnerability • Perceptions of climate and migration threats shape insecurity responses • Individual insecurity varies across institutional and national contexts • Findings highlight socio-psychological drivers of economic anxiety

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104533
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Employment and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of climate and migration concerns in shaping personal economic insecurity in European societies

Oksana Liashenko, Bogdan Adamyk, Oksana Adamyk
1 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Employment and Welfare Studies
46.02
article

The role of climate and migration concerns in shaping personal economic insecurity in European societies

Oksana Liashenko, Bogdan Adamyk, Oksana Adamyk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigates how perceptions of societal threats, specifically climate change and migration, influence subjective economic insecurity across eleven European countries (Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Finland, France, Hungary, Iceland, Poland, Portugal, Slovenia, and the United Kingdom). The selection of countries was based on data availability within the European Social Survey (ESS) ERIC CRONOS-3 Wave 2 survey design. Nonetheless, the sample reflects significant institutional diversity across welfare regimes, labour market structures, and political discourse environments: Nordic social-democratic regimes; continental corporatist systems; post-socialist transitions; and liberal-leaning contexts. We formulate a composite measure of economic insecurity that encompasses concerns about maintaining living standards, managing financial shocks, and future economic prospects. Perceived climate and migration threats are operationalised as separate multi-item indices. Results reveal that both threat domains independently increase economic insecurity, controlling for income, age, education, and gender. Interaction models demonstrate systematic variation across socioeconomic strata, with lower-income and less-educated groups exhibiting heightened sensitivity to threat perceptions. Cross-national analysis shows substantial variation, suggesting that institutional contexts—particularly welfare state architectures and political discourse environments—moderate how macro-level concerns translate into personal economic assessments. These findings advance affective political economy by demonstrating spillover mechanisms linking societal threats to economic self-evaluations. Policy implications are twofold: targeted social protection should bolster resilience among vulnerable groups, while broader efforts should reframe climate and migration as collective challenges focused on adaptation rather than threats. This includes strengthening trust in institutions and ensuring universal, predictable guarantees that restore a sense of control and shared efficacy. • A dual-level model explains subjective economic insecurity in Europe • Societal threat perceptions increase perceived economic vulnerability • Perceptions of climate and migration threats shape insecurity responses • Individual insecurity varies across institutional and national contexts • Findings highlight socio-psychological drivers of economic anxiety

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 131
Loughborough University (GB), Aston University (GB)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Employment and Welfare Studies
46.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.