Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Amyloid and Tau Positivity in Alzheimer's Disease Using Clinically Accessible Features

Abstract Background Prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers can improve public health strategies, especially if achieved with easily collectable data in a single consultation. Machine learning (ML) offers versatile tools for clinical and research applications. This study investigated a ML model's ability to predict amyloid and tau positivity using easily obtainable features. Method Individuals with amyloid and tau status were selected from ADNI, TRIAD, and PPMI datasets (Model Building) and from the NACC dataset (Validation). Shared clinical features included age, sex, education, clinical diagnosis, MoCA scores, and BMI. Amyloid positivity was defined by amyloid‐PET (PIB‐PET, FBB‐PET, or AZD4694‐PET) or CSF AB42, and tau positivity by Tau‐PET (MK6240‐PET, AV1451‐PET) or CSF p ‐tau181. For NACC, positivity derived from fields AMYLPET and TAUPETAD. Data processing is summarized in Figure 1. Result The Model Building sample included 1593 individuals (mean MoCA 25.3 ± 4.3). The Validation cohort included 861 individuals (mean MoCA 22.2 ± 2.8). The model achieved high performance for predicting amyloid and tau positivity, with mean AUCs of 0.89 and 0.83 for Model Building and Validation, respectively (Figure 2a, 2b). In Validation, high sensitivity (0.93) came at the expense of specificity (0.65), while Model Building showed balanced sensitivity and specificity (0.81 and 0.83). Higher age, lower MoCA, cognitive impairment, female sex, and lower BMI increased the probability of positivity (Figure 2c, 2d). Cognitive impairment was the most impactful feature in both Model Building and Validation datasets, followed by MoCA and age (Figure 2e, 2f). Conclusion Predicting AD biomarkers using ML and readily collectable features is feasible and accurate. The model's high sensitivity indicates a potential research utility in clinical trials for population screening to minimize false negatives. Future efforts should enhance generalizability, explore additional features, and prioritize real‐world validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_105937
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Amyloid and Tau Positivity in Alzheimer's Disease Using Clinically Accessible Features

Nesrine Rahmouni, Luiza Santos Machado, Firoza Zubeida Lussier, J. K. M. ller Stevenson et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Machine Learning Approach for Predicting Amyloid and Tau Positivity in Alzheimer's Disease Using Clinically Accessible Features

Nesrine Rahmouni, Luiza Santos Machado, Firoza Zubeida Lussier, J. K. M. ller Stevenson, Daniel Arnold, Rodrigo C. Barros, Arthur Macedo, Joseph Therriault, Marco De Bastiani, Stijn Servaes, Artur Francisco Schumacher‐Schuh, Gleb Bezgin, Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, Andrea L. Benedet, Mira Chamoun, Eduardo R. Zimmer, Christian Mattjie, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Pedro Rosa‐Neto
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Prediction of Alzheimer's disease (AD) biomarkers can improve public health strategies, especially if achieved with easily collectable data in a single consultation. Machine learning (ML) offers versatile tools for clinical and research applications. This study investigated a ML model's ability to predict amyloid and tau positivity using easily obtainable features. Method Individuals with amyloid and tau status were selected from ADNI, TRIAD, and PPMI datasets (Model Building) and from the NACC dataset (Validation). Shared clinical features included age, sex, education, clinical diagnosis, MoCA scores, and BMI. Amyloid positivity was defined by amyloid‐PET (PIB‐PET, FBB‐PET, or AZD4694‐PET) or CSF AB42, and tau positivity by Tau‐PET (MK6240‐PET, AV1451‐PET) or CSF p ‐tau181. For NACC, positivity derived from fields AMYLPET and TAUPETAD. Data processing is summarized in Figure 1. Result The Model Building sample included 1593 individuals (mean MoCA 25.3 ± 4.3). The Validation cohort included 861 individuals (mean MoCA 22.2 ± 2.8). The model achieved high performance for predicting amyloid and tau positivity, with mean AUCs of 0.89 and 0.83 for Model Building and Validation, respectively (Figure 2a, 2b). In Validation, high sensitivity (0.93) came at the expense of specificity (0.65), while Model Building showed balanced sensitivity and specificity (0.81 and 0.83). Higher age, lower MoCA, cognitive impairment, female sex, and lower BMI increased the probability of positivity (Figure 2c, 2d). Cognitive impairment was the most impactful feature in both Model Building and Validation datasets, followed by MoCA and age (Figure 2e, 2f). Conclusion Predicting AD biomarkers using ML and readily collectable features is feasible and accurate. The model's high sensitivity indicates a potential research utility in clinical trials for population screening to minimize false negatives. Future efforts should enhance generalizability, explore additional features, and prioritize real‐world validation.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
University of Southern California (US), Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA), Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), University of Pittsburgh (US), Instituto do Cérebro (BR), Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (BR), Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul (BR), McGill University (CA), University of Gothenburg (SE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.