Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities

This systematic review demonstrates that multimodal AI models consistently outperform single-modal models for AD diagnosis, prognosis, and risk prediction by integrating complementary biological, clinical, and behavioral information. Unlike prior reviews, this review provides a unified synthesis across heterogeneous clinical, imaging, genetic, and linguistic datasets, enabling cross-domain comparison of modeling strategies and performance. However, the generalizability of reported performance was limited due to substantial heterogeneity in dataset composition, outcome definitions, and validation, and prevalent risks of bias. By evaluating these factors, this review clarifies where current evidence is robust and where caution is warranted. The findings highlight the need for standardized multimodal benchmarks, transparent evaluation protocols, and clinically grounded model design to enable reliable real-world deployment. Overall, this work advances the field by framing multimodal AI not only as a performance-driven tool but also as a translational framework for equitable, interpretable, and scalable AD diagnosis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2196/85414
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities

Tianyan Huang, Anthony J. Mulholland, Ziwen Yu, Qiang Liu
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Machine Learning in Healthcare
article

Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities

Tianyan Huang, Anthony J. Mulholland, Ziwen Yu, Qiang Liu
article en

Abstract

This systematic review demonstrates that multimodal AI models consistently outperform single-modal models for AD diagnosis, prognosis, and risk prediction by integrating complementary biological, clinical, and behavioral information. Unlike prior reviews, this review provides a unified synthesis across heterogeneous clinical, imaging, genetic, and linguistic datasets, enabling cross-domain comparison of modeling strategies and performance. However, the generalizability of reported performance was limited due to substantial heterogeneity in dataset composition, outcome definitions, and validation, and prevalent risks of bias. By evaluating these factors, this review clarifies where current evidence is robust and where caution is warranted. The findings highlight the need for standardized multimodal benchmarks, transparent evaluation protocols, and clinically grounded model design to enable reliable real-world deployment. Overall, this work advances the field by framing multimodal AI not only as a performance-driven tool but also as a translational framework for equitable, interpretable, and scalable AD diagnosis.

Journal of Medical Internet ResearchVol. 28
University of Bristol (GB), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Machine Learning in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities — Tianyan Huang, Anthony J. Mulholland, et al. · Journal of Medical Internet Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS