Stakeholder-informed environmental-economic tradeoffs at the farm and forest scale

Agriculture and silviculture are economically and culturally important across broad regions of the world that rely on groundwater resources. However, these practices consume water and can be sources of nonpoint source pollution, affecting water quantity and quality in aquifers and associated ecosystems. Specific management practices (MP) applied at the farm- and forest-scale substantially influence aquifer recharge and nitrate leaching and have the potential to reduce environmental impacts. However, MP implementation is often associated with high producer costs, potentially reducing their economic viability. Rigorously quantifying the environmental and economic tradeoffs of MP implementation is thus critical for developing policies to support and incentivize their adoption. In this study, we engaged with a broad community of stakeholders in a participatory modeling process to develop a coupled biophysical-economic modeling platform and used it to assess a range of MP for corn, peanut, carrot, hay, pasture-raised cattle, and plantation pine in the Floridan Aquifer region of the southeastern United States, focused here on Florida. We used a coupled Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)-MODFLOW model to simulate groundwater recharge, nitrate leaching, and crop/forest yields. Economic analyses used enterprise budgets informed by SWAT yield outputs to compute net producer returns, and results were compared within a three-dimensional tradeoff space (aquifer recharge-nitrate load-net financial returns). Results indicated clear synergies and tradeoffs among production systems, with row crops having the highest economic benefit and largest environmental impacts, while pine and forage production systems had smaller economic benefits but lower environmental impacts. Importantly, improved MP dramatically reduced environmental impacts while in some cases achieving higher net returns. These observations suggest that improved MP can improve both the environmental and economic sustainability of agricultural and silvicultural production in the Floridan Aquifer region, a finding with relevance for similar agricultural regions globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2026.128584
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholder-informed environmental-economic tradeoffs at the farm and forest scale

Andrea L. Smith, Unmesh Koirala, Christa D. Court, W.L. Bartels et al.
Journal of Environmental Management
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
article

Stakeholder-informed environmental-economic tradeoffs at the farm and forest scale

Andrea L. Smith, Unmesh Koirala, Christa D. Court, W.L. Bartels, Nathan Reaver, Walter B. Graham, Kevin Athearn, Robert Hochmuth, Kristin Rowles, Rob de Rooij, D. Kaplan, J. Love, K. Schlatter, F. He, D. Lee, P. Carton de Grammont
article en

Abstract

Agriculture and silviculture are economically and culturally important across broad regions of the world that rely on groundwater resources. However, these practices consume water and can be sources of nonpoint source pollution, affecting water quantity and quality in aquifers and associated ecosystems. Specific management practices (MP) applied at the farm- and forest-scale substantially influence aquifer recharge and nitrate leaching and have the potential to reduce environmental impacts. However, MP implementation is often associated with high producer costs, potentially reducing their economic viability. Rigorously quantifying the environmental and economic tradeoffs of MP implementation is thus critical for developing policies to support and incentivize their adoption. In this study, we engaged with a broad community of stakeholders in a participatory modeling process to develop a coupled biophysical-economic modeling platform and used it to assess a range of MP for corn, peanut, carrot, hay, pasture-raised cattle, and plantation pine in the Floridan Aquifer region of the southeastern United States, focused here on Florida. We used a coupled Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)-MODFLOW model to simulate groundwater recharge, nitrate leaching, and crop/forest yields. Economic analyses used enterprise budgets informed by SWAT yield outputs to compute net producer returns, and results were compared within a three-dimensional tradeoff space (aquifer recharge-nitrate load-net financial returns). Results indicated clear synergies and tradeoffs among production systems, with row crops having the highest economic benefit and largest environmental impacts, while pine and forage production systems had smaller economic benefits but lower environmental impacts. Importantly, improved MP dramatically reduced environmental impacts while in some cases achieving higher net returns. These observations suggest that improved MP can improve both the environmental and economic sustainability of agricultural and silvicultural production in the Floridan Aquifer region, a finding with relevance for similar agricultural regions globally.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 398
Albany State University (US), University of Georgia (US), University of Florida (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.