Mini Review on the Dynamics and Stability Mechanisms of CO <sub>2</sub> -Flooding-Produced Crude Oil Foams: Recent Progress and Perspectives

CO2–flooding technology, a significant strategy for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and geological carbon sequestration, can lead to foamy oil formation during surface gathering due to rapid pressure drops, resulting in reduced metering accuracy and complicating gas–liquid separation. This review systematically investigates the kinetic behavior and stability mechanisms of CO2–induced crude oil foams, focusing on bubble nucleation pathways, growth kinetics, coalescence, and rupture behavior, and analyzes the effects of crude oil viscosity, composition, gas properties, and nanoparticles (NPs) on foam stability. The foam dynamic behavior and stability mechanisms of CO2–flooding-produced fluids are shown to exhibit significant differences compared to aqueous foams and other non–aqueous foams, driven by the complex components in the effluents from CO2 flooding and the intricate flow processes of CO2–flooding produced fluids within the wellbore, pipeline, and separator. Heterogeneous nucleation is identified as the dominant bubble formation mechanism. The synergistic effects of asphaltenes, resins, wax crystals, NPs, and other components may give rise to complex cooperative mechanisms, which exert an incredibly intricate influence on foam stability. Therefore, a systematic evaluation from a multiscale perspective, encompassing microscopic mechanisms, mesoscale generalizations, and macroscopic experiments, is required to fully describe the dynamic behavior and stability mechanisms of foams. Moreover, it is essential to develop more reliable defoaming models to provide more effective guidance for production. Existing defoaming models are primarily based on empirical formulas and often lack a robust analysis of multi–parameter coupling effects on oil–based foams. Advancing future studies require integrating molecular dynamics simulations, quantitative foam characterization experiments, foam dynamic analyses, and AI–driven theoretical frameworks to develop multi–scale predictive models. These models would enable a systematic understanding of foam evolution under varying production conditions, ultimately providing theoretical guidance for optimizing CO2–flooding surface transport infrastructure and process control.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy & Fuels
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5c03495
Primary Topic
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mini Review on the Dynamics and Stability Mechanisms of CO 2 -Flooding-Produced Crude Oil Foams: Recent Progress and Perspectives

Z. Liu, Y. X. Chen, Xiangshun Zeng, Xiaokai Xing et al.
Energy & Fuels
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
article

Mini Review on the Dynamics and Stability Mechanisms of CO 2 -Flooding-Produced Crude Oil Foams: Recent Progress and Perspectives

Z. Liu, Y. X. Chen, Xiangshun Zeng, Xiaokai Xing, Xiaoqin Xiong, Wenzhao Qiu
article en

Abstract

CO2–flooding technology, a significant strategy for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) and geological carbon sequestration, can lead to foamy oil formation during surface gathering due to rapid pressure drops, resulting in reduced metering accuracy and complicating gas–liquid separation. This review systematically investigates the kinetic behavior and stability mechanisms of CO2–induced crude oil foams, focusing on bubble nucleation pathways, growth kinetics, coalescence, and rupture behavior, and analyzes the effects of crude oil viscosity, composition, gas properties, and nanoparticles (NPs) on foam stability. The foam dynamic behavior and stability mechanisms of CO2–flooding-produced fluids are shown to exhibit significant differences compared to aqueous foams and other non–aqueous foams, driven by the complex components in the effluents from CO2 flooding and the intricate flow processes of CO2–flooding produced fluids within the wellbore, pipeline, and separator. Heterogeneous nucleation is identified as the dominant bubble formation mechanism. The synergistic effects of asphaltenes, resins, wax crystals, NPs, and other components may give rise to complex cooperative mechanisms, which exert an incredibly intricate influence on foam stability. Therefore, a systematic evaluation from a multiscale perspective, encompassing microscopic mechanisms, mesoscale generalizations, and macroscopic experiments, is required to fully describe the dynamic behavior and stability mechanisms of foams. Moreover, it is essential to develop more reliable defoaming models to provide more effective guidance for production. Existing defoaming models are primarily based on empirical formulas and often lack a robust analysis of multi–parameter coupling effects on oil–based foams. Advancing future studies require integrating molecular dynamics simulations, quantitative foam characterization experiments, foam dynamic analyses, and AI–driven theoretical frameworks to develop multi–scale predictive models. These models would enable a systematic understanding of foam evolution under varying production conditions, ultimately providing theoretical guidance for optimizing CO2–flooding surface transport infrastructure and process control.

Energy & FuelsVol. 40(3)
United States Department of Transportation (US), China University of Petroleum, Beijing (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.