Metacurate-ML: Approaches to managing semantic equivalence between questions

Longitudinal and comparative research relies heavily on repeated measures and harmonisation of data, DDI-Lifecycle has strong support for this through the variable cascade, however, scaling such activity has proven difficult to put into practice. Social science (and other!) researchers approach the development of questions from a range of perspectives, even where the response options are (nearly) identical, the phrasing and orchestration of the questions can vary considerably. This places limits on the utility of standard text comparison techniques (e.g. TF-IDF, Bag-of-Words). The presentation will outline the strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches taken during the project to address this problem. This includes problem decomposition which breaks the problem into sub-problems to mitigate the insensitivity of unsupervised methods to nuanced question relationships. Additionally, we will cover techniques for fine-tuning generative large language models for concept extraction and injecting the results into a subsequent retrieval model.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18182017
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metacurate-ML: Approaches to managing semantic equivalence between questions

Wing Yan Li, Suparna De, Jon Johnson
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Metacurate-ML: Approaches to managing semantic equivalence between questions

Wing Yan Li, Suparna De, Jon Johnson
article en

Abstract

Longitudinal and comparative research relies heavily on repeated measures and harmonisation of data, DDI-Lifecycle has strong support for this through the variable cascade, however, scaling such activity has proven difficult to put into practice. Social science (and other!) researchers approach the development of questions from a range of perspectives, even where the response options are (nearly) identical, the phrasing and orchestration of the questions can vary considerably. This places limits on the utility of standard text comparison techniques (e.g. TF-IDF, Bag-of-Words). The presentation will outline the strengths and weaknesses of the different approaches taken during the project to address this problem. This includes problem decomposition which breaks the problem into sub-problems to mitigate the insensitivity of unsupervised methods to nuanced question relationships. Additionally, we will cover techniques for fine-tuning generative large language models for concept extraction and injecting the results into a subsequent retrieval model.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Surrey (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.