Uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

UELIF and MIS-TLIF showed comparable outcomes regarding disc height, lumbar lordosis, fusion rates, and complication rates. Although MIS-TLIF exhibited shorter operation time and reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy duration, UELIF provided significant advantages by minimizing blood loss, postoperative drainage, creatine kinase, CRP, ambulation time, and hospital stays. Furthermore, UELIF showed superior efficacy in alleviating early postoperative low back pain and leg pain and promoting early postoperative lumbar function recovery. Given study limitations, such as the majority of retrospective studies and significant heterogeneity, high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials are recommended in the future to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European journal of medical research
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40001-026-03834-x
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jinchun Wu, Jidong Ju, Yu Zhang
European journal of medical research
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Jinchun Wu, Jidong Ju, Yu Zhang
article en

Abstract

UELIF and MIS-TLIF showed comparable outcomes regarding disc height, lumbar lordosis, fusion rates, and complication rates. Although MIS-TLIF exhibited shorter operation time and reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy duration, UELIF provided significant advantages by minimizing blood loss, postoperative drainage, creatine kinase, CRP, ambulation time, and hospital stays. Furthermore, UELIF showed superior efficacy in alleviating early postoperative low back pain and leg pain and promoting early postoperative lumbar function recovery. Given study limitations, such as the majority of retrospective studies and significant heterogeneity, high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials are recommended in the future to confirm these findings and guide clinical practice.

European journal of medical researchVol. 31(1)
First People's Hospital of Jingzhou (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis — Jinchun Wu, Jidong Ju, et al. · European journal of medical research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS