Perceived training gaps of newly licensed veterinarians and impact of participation in a peer-facilitated quality assurance program in Ontario, Canada: interviews with peer advisors

Newly graduated and newly licensed veterinarians possess the knowledge and skill required to practice medicine but often struggle to translate that knowledge and skill in a clinical setting without additional supports. The objectives of this exploratory pilot study were to explore the preparedness to practice of newly licensed veterinarians by understanding the perceived potential knowledge or skills gaps and to describe the perceived impact of participation in a peer-facilitated quality assurance program from the perspective of the peer advisors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with peer advisors (<i>n</i> = 10), audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and inductively analyzed using Applied Thematic Analysis. Study participants identified perceived gaps in skills and training that may exist for newly licensed veterinarians, including non-clinical professional skills (e.g., communication, self-care) and volume of clinical skills (e.g., species-specific surgery, internal medicine), which may negatively impact their preparedness to practice. Study participants described participation in the peer-facilitated quality assurance program as encouraging self-reflection and continued improvement throughout licensees' careers rather than traditional in-clinic peer mentorship aimed at improving clinical and non-clinical confidence and proficiency. Study participants described a desire to beneficially influence the profession through helping other veterinarians and their own positive feelings that resulted from their participation in the peer-facilitated quality assurance program. Program participation provided positive experiences for peer advisors and perceived positive experiences for licensees while encouraging learning through self-reflection. There are elements in the Peer Advisory Conversation program that lend itself to being integrated into existing or future peer mentorship programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1725153
Primary Topic
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived training gaps of newly licensed veterinarians and impact of participation in a peer-facilitated quality assurance program in Ontario, Canada: interviews with peer advisors

Basem Gohar, Kate Wycherley, Michael W. Brunt
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
article

Perceived training gaps of newly licensed veterinarians and impact of participation in a peer-facilitated quality assurance program in Ontario, Canada: interviews with peer advisors

Basem Gohar, Kate Wycherley, Michael W. Brunt
article en

Abstract

Newly graduated and newly licensed veterinarians possess the knowledge and skill required to practice medicine but often struggle to translate that knowledge and skill in a clinical setting without additional supports. The objectives of this exploratory pilot study were to explore the preparedness to practice of newly licensed veterinarians by understanding the perceived potential knowledge or skills gaps and to describe the perceived impact of participation in a peer-facilitated quality assurance program from the perspective of the peer advisors. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with peer advisors (<i>n</i> = 10), audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and inductively analyzed using Applied Thematic Analysis. Study participants identified perceived gaps in skills and training that may exist for newly licensed veterinarians, including non-clinical professional skills (e.g., communication, self-care) and volume of clinical skills (e.g., species-specific surgery, internal medicine), which may negatively impact their preparedness to practice. Study participants described participation in the peer-facilitated quality assurance program as encouraging self-reflection and continued improvement throughout licensees' careers rather than traditional in-clinic peer mentorship aimed at improving clinical and non-clinical confidence and proficiency. Study participants described a desire to beneficially influence the profession through helping other veterinarians and their own positive feelings that resulted from their participation in the peer-facilitated quality assurance program. Program participation provided positive experiences for peer advisors and perceived positive experiences for licensees while encouraging learning through self-reflection. There are elements in the Peer Advisory Conversation program that lend itself to being integrated into existing or future peer mentorship programs.

Frontiers in Veterinary ScienceVol. 12
Laurentian University (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Mitacs
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.