Who owns the data? Fisheries science, epistemic power, and Russia–Africa relations

Fisheries science has become an increasingly salient instrument of engagement in Russia–Africa relations, yet the politics of data ownership embedded in such cooperation remain largely overlooked. Prevailing accounts of science diplomacy and technical assistance tend to frame fisheries surveys, training programs, and research partnerships as neutral capacity-building initiatives. The paper challenges these assumptions by asking a central question: who owns the data produced through fisheries science, and with what political consequences? Drawing on historical and contemporary cases of Russian fisheries engagement in Africa, the paper conceptualizes fisheries science as a form of epistemic power exercised through the construction and control of epistemic infrastructure. It situates contemporary survey practices, data retention, and scientific training within longer trajectories of knowledge extraction and asymmetrical resource governance. The paper argues that control over fisheries data—its production, validation, and circulation—constitutes a durable form of epistemic influence that shapes regulatory authority, access negotiations, and states’ capacity to govern marine resources. By foregrounding data ownership as a political relationship rather than a technical detail, the paper advances a framework that bridges science diplomacy and political economy, offering new insights into Russia–Africa relations and the geopolitics of knowledge in global fisheries governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Perspectives
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/2336825x261416356
Primary Topic
International Maritime Law Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who owns the data? Fisheries science, epistemic power, and Russia–Africa relations

Seun Bamidele, Olusegun Oladele Idowu
New Perspectives
International Maritime Law Issues
article

Who owns the data? Fisheries science, epistemic power, and Russia–Africa relations

Seun Bamidele, Olusegun Oladele Idowu
article en

Abstract

Fisheries science has become an increasingly salient instrument of engagement in Russia–Africa relations, yet the politics of data ownership embedded in such cooperation remain largely overlooked. Prevailing accounts of science diplomacy and technical assistance tend to frame fisheries surveys, training programs, and research partnerships as neutral capacity-building initiatives. The paper challenges these assumptions by asking a central question: who owns the data produced through fisheries science, and with what political consequences? Drawing on historical and contemporary cases of Russian fisheries engagement in Africa, the paper conceptualizes fisheries science as a form of epistemic power exercised through the construction and control of epistemic infrastructure. It situates contemporary survey practices, data retention, and scientific training within longer trajectories of knowledge extraction and asymmetrical resource governance. The paper argues that control over fisheries data—its production, validation, and circulation—constitutes a durable form of epistemic influence that shapes regulatory authority, access negotiations, and states’ capacity to govern marine resources. By foregrounding data ownership as a political relationship rather than a technical detail, the paper advances a framework that bridges science diplomacy and political economy, offering new insights into Russia–Africa relations and the geopolitics of knowledge in global fisheries governance.

New PerspectivesVol. 34(1)
Afe Babalola University (NG), Federal University Oye Ekiti (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
International Maritime Law Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.