Metabolic Syndrome Components and Cancer Risk in Normal-Weight Subjects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in over 18 Million Individuals

<b>Background/objectives:</b> Metabolic abnormalities, independent of excess weight, may contribute to cancer risk even among individuals of normal weight, though their role remains unclear. This study sought to ascertain if metabolically unhealthy normal-weight (MUNW) individuals, generally characterized by a normal body mass index alongside the presence of metabolic abnormalities, have higher cancer risk than metabolically healthy peers, to analyze variations in risk across obesity-related cancer types, and to examine which single specific metabolic components can predict cancer independently in normal-weight individuals. <b>Methods:</b> Two authors systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for longitudinal studies, published from inception to July 2025, that included normal-weight adults, classified participants by metabolic health status, and reported incident cancer outcomes in metabolically unhealthy versus healthy normal-weight groups. Hazard ratio (HR) estimates were extracted from each study and were pooled using random-effects inverse-variance model with empirical Bayes variance estimator. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-five studies involving 18,210,858 participants (56.0% females, mean age = 53.8 years) were included. A total of 280,828 new cancer cases were diagnosed during follow-up (mean = 10.6 years). In comparison with metabolically healthy normal-weight individuals, MUNW individuals had a 20% higher risk of cancer (HR = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.28). Increased risks were observed for gastric cancer (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04-1.87), pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.21-1.54), and colorectal cancer (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.14-1.57), which were the cancer types showing statistically significant associations in subgroup analyses. Normal-weight participants presenting specific metabolic factors like central adiposity or glucose metabolism abnormalities had a 20% (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.13-1.37) and 23% (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.41) increased cancer risk, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: MUNW individuals are at higher risk of cancer, with specific metabolic abnormalities, particularly central adiposity and impaired glucose regulation, emerging as the factors most strongly associated with increased risk in normal-weight individuals. Routine metabolic screening and detailed phenotyping are crucial to identify these risks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020538
Primary Topic
Cancer Risks and Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabolic Syndrome Components and Cancer Risk in Normal-Weight Subjects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in over 18 Million Individuals

Jacqueline Páez-Herrera, Óscar Caballero, Jorge Olivares-Arancibia, Yasmin Ezzatvar et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Cancer Risks and Factors
article

Metabolic Syndrome Components and Cancer Risk in Normal-Weight Subjects: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in over 18 Million Individuals

Jacqueline Páez-Herrera, Óscar Caballero, Jorge Olivares-Arancibia, Yasmin Ezzatvar, Rodrigo Yáñez-Sepúlveda
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/objectives:</b> Metabolic abnormalities, independent of excess weight, may contribute to cancer risk even among individuals of normal weight, though their role remains unclear. This study sought to ascertain if metabolically unhealthy normal-weight (MUNW) individuals, generally characterized by a normal body mass index alongside the presence of metabolic abnormalities, have higher cancer risk than metabolically healthy peers, to analyze variations in risk across obesity-related cancer types, and to examine which single specific metabolic components can predict cancer independently in normal-weight individuals. <b>Methods:</b> Two authors systematically searched the PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases for longitudinal studies, published from inception to July 2025, that included normal-weight adults, classified participants by metabolic health status, and reported incident cancer outcomes in metabolically unhealthy versus healthy normal-weight groups. Hazard ratio (HR) estimates were extracted from each study and were pooled using random-effects inverse-variance model with empirical Bayes variance estimator. <b>Results:</b> Thirty-five studies involving 18,210,858 participants (56.0% females, mean age = 53.8 years) were included. A total of 280,828 new cancer cases were diagnosed during follow-up (mean = 10.6 years). In comparison with metabolically healthy normal-weight individuals, MUNW individuals had a 20% higher risk of cancer (HR = 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.28). Increased risks were observed for gastric cancer (HR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.04-1.87), pancreatic cancer (HR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.21-1.54), and colorectal cancer (HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.14-1.57), which were the cancer types showing statistically significant associations in subgroup analyses. Normal-weight participants presenting specific metabolic factors like central adiposity or glucose metabolism abnormalities had a 20% (HR = 1.20, 95% CI: 1.13-1.37) and 23% (HR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.06-1.41) increased cancer risk, respectively. <b>Conclusions</b>: MUNW individuals are at higher risk of cancer, with specific metabolic abnormalities, particularly central adiposity and impaired glucose regulation, emerging as the factors most strongly associated with increased risk in normal-weight individuals. Routine metabolic screening and detailed phenotyping are crucial to identify these risks.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
Universitat de València (ES), Universidad Espíritu Santo (EC), Viña del Mar University (CL), Pontificial Catholic University of Valparaiso (CL), Universidad de Los Lagos (CL), Departamento de Educación (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Cancer Risks and Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.