Beyond discrete indicators: Modeling intersectional flood vulnerability

Social vulnerability to flooding is shaped by intersectional social marginalization, yet most quantitative assessments employ indicators of single populations. This study applies spatial machine learning to examine how the intersectional social vulnerability indicators of poverty-race, poverty-housing tenure, and race-housing tenure compare with traditional discrete indicators of single populations in predicting flood exposure in California. Using geographically weighted random forests and partial dependence plots, we model spatial heterogeneity and non-linear relationships between social vulnerability and exposure. We quantified flood exposure using a population-adjusted measure derived from building footprints and modeled 500-year fluvial and pluvial flood hazard. The results reveal distinct explanatory power of discrete and intersectional indicators. Variable importance analysis shows that intersectional indicators, such as Poor Renters and Non-white Renters, have stronger predictive importance than their discrete counterparts, particularly in urban regions, with mean local IncMSE values of 15.6–16.9 % compared to 12.3–14.8 %. Partial dependence analysis revealed threshold effects of non-linear indicator influence, with predicted exposure increasing sharply once intersectional populations exceed ∼60 % of tract-level representation. Our findings highlight limitations of assuming uniform indicator effects, and the need for non-linear, spatially adaptive models that increase conceptual alignment between social vulnerability theory and indicator modeling by integrating intersectional dimensions. • Evaluates spatial indicators of intersectional social vulnerability to flooding. • Applies Random Forest and Geographically Weighted Random Forest models. • Intersectional indicators outperform discrete ones in predicting flood exposure. • Social vulnerability relationships are nonlinear and strongest in urban regions. • Partial dependence plots identify thresholds where flood exposure shifts for vulnerable groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Geography
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2026.103894
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond discrete indicators: Modeling intersectional flood vulnerability

Md Asif Rahman, Sina Razzaghi Asl, Kaeleb Royster, Eric Tate et al.
Applied Geography
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Beyond discrete indicators: Modeling intersectional flood vulnerability

Md Asif Rahman, Sina Razzaghi Asl, Kaeleb Royster, Eric Tate, Christopher T. Emrich
article en

Abstract

Social vulnerability to flooding is shaped by intersectional social marginalization, yet most quantitative assessments employ indicators of single populations. This study applies spatial machine learning to examine how the intersectional social vulnerability indicators of poverty-race, poverty-housing tenure, and race-housing tenure compare with traditional discrete indicators of single populations in predicting flood exposure in California. Using geographically weighted random forests and partial dependence plots, we model spatial heterogeneity and non-linear relationships between social vulnerability and exposure. We quantified flood exposure using a population-adjusted measure derived from building footprints and modeled 500-year fluvial and pluvial flood hazard. The results reveal distinct explanatory power of discrete and intersectional indicators. Variable importance analysis shows that intersectional indicators, such as Poor Renters and Non-white Renters, have stronger predictive importance than their discrete counterparts, particularly in urban regions, with mean local IncMSE values of 15.6–16.9 % compared to 12.3–14.8 %. Partial dependence analysis revealed threshold effects of non-linear indicator influence, with predicted exposure increasing sharply once intersectional populations exceed ∼60 % of tract-level representation. Our findings highlight limitations of assuming uniform indicator effects, and the need for non-linear, spatially adaptive models that increase conceptual alignment between social vulnerability theory and indicator modeling by integrating intersectional dimensions. • Evaluates spatial indicators of intersectional social vulnerability to flooding. • Applies Random Forest and Geographically Weighted Random Forest models. • Intersectional indicators outperform discrete ones in predicting flood exposure. • Social vulnerability relationships are nonlinear and strongest in urban regions. • Partial dependence plots identify thresholds where flood exposure shifts for vulnerable groups.

Applied GeographyVol. 187
University of Central Florida (US), University of Iowa (US), Princeton Public Schools (US), California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (US), Office of the Governor (US), Old Dominion University (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.