Using the fish plasma model to prioritize pharmaceuticals and protect fish from potential adverse effects

In the absence of a robust database of adverse effects to aquatic biota from pharmaceuticals introduced into the environment, alternate approaches are needed to assess risk. One such approach is the fish plasma model (FPM), which can be used to prioritize pharmaceuticals as a function of potential altered biological responses for fish exposed to these chemicals in receiving waters. Other published prioritization schemes assessing effects utilize quantitative-structure activity relationships, cellular assays, biochemical markers, and various apical effects. The FPM provides another line of evidence that is complementary to these approaches. We also examined potential effects due to human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene activity for the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) as another potentially useful and complementary approach for prioritization. In this study, we used the FPM to examine predicted effects for the most commonly prescribed pharmaceuticals, which allowed us to focus on the most environmentally relevant drugs potentially toxic to fish. Drugs with peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values were examined with a global database of surface water concentrations to predict potential risk for fish exposed to the most biologically active compounds. To prioritize the APIs most likely to cause adverse effects for fish, we limited the list to those with a response ratio ([plasma]/1%Cmax) ≥ 1 (n = 57) and those APIs without exposure concentrations exhibiting a 1%Cmax value ≤ 0.1 ng/ml (n = 50). The majority (n = 63) of the top prioritized APIs on this list fell into six drug classes: hormones (n = 21), antidepressants (n = 13), antihistamines (n = 8), anticholinergics (n = 4), corticosteroids (n = 4), and antihypertensives (n = 13). The FPM is advantageous because it is based on expected low-dose in vivo biological effects resulting from chemicals designed to interact with a specific target. Currently, the FPM is mostly limited to pharmaceuticals; however, this approach can be expanded to other chemicals with toxicity data expressed as a plasma concentration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgag001
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Using the fish plasma model to prioritize pharmaceuticals and protect fish from potential adverse effects

James P. Meador, Molly E. Shuman-Goodier
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
article

Using the fish plasma model to prioritize pharmaceuticals and protect fish from potential adverse effects

James P. Meador, Molly E. Shuman-Goodier
article en

Abstract

In the absence of a robust database of adverse effects to aquatic biota from pharmaceuticals introduced into the environment, alternate approaches are needed to assess risk. One such approach is the fish plasma model (FPM), which can be used to prioritize pharmaceuticals as a function of potential altered biological responses for fish exposed to these chemicals in receiving waters. Other published prioritization schemes assessing effects utilize quantitative-structure activity relationships, cellular assays, biochemical markers, and various apical effects. The FPM provides another line of evidence that is complementary to these approaches. We also examined potential effects due to human Ether-à-go-go-Related Gene activity for the active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) as another potentially useful and complementary approach for prioritization. In this study, we used the FPM to examine predicted effects for the most commonly prescribed pharmaceuticals, which allowed us to focus on the most environmentally relevant drugs potentially toxic to fish. Drugs with peak plasma concentration (Cmax) values were examined with a global database of surface water concentrations to predict potential risk for fish exposed to the most biologically active compounds. To prioritize the APIs most likely to cause adverse effects for fish, we limited the list to those with a response ratio ([plasma]/1%Cmax) ≥ 1 (n = 57) and those APIs without exposure concentrations exhibiting a 1%Cmax value ≤ 0.1 ng/ml (n = 50). The majority (n = 63) of the top prioritized APIs on this list fell into six drug classes: hormones (n = 21), antidepressants (n = 13), antihistamines (n = 8), anticholinergics (n = 4), corticosteroids (n = 4), and antihypertensives (n = 13). The FPM is advantageous because it is based on expected low-dose in vivo biological effects resulting from chemicals designed to interact with a specific target. Currently, the FPM is mostly limited to pharmaceuticals; however, this approach can be expanded to other chemicals with toxicity data expressed as a plasma concentration.

Environmental Toxicology and ChemistryVol. 45(3)
University of Washington (US), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.