The ESG Flow–Return Paradox: Green sentiment boosts inflows but lags in returns

We examine how green sentiment affects ESG mutual fund flows and returns using Google Trends data for 107 funds (April 2019-April 2024). We document an ESG investment paradox: in months when green sentiment rises, ESG funds receive larger capital inflows yet record lower contemporaneous returns, creating a flow-performance wedge. Elevated sentiment, however, positively predicts both flows and returns in the following month. This indicates short-term momentum rather than reversal. Log-linear panel regressions reveal a "values-salience channel" where attention-driven demand creates crowding and execution frictions. Geographic effects are keyword-specific: The United States (U.S.) funds show similar flow responses to "ESG" and "Sustainability" sentiment as European funds, but experience significantly larger return declines when "Green" and "Climate" keywords trend, consistent with politicized climate discourse in U.S. markets. These findings reveal that sentiment timing matters, keyword framing shapes cross-market dynamics, and values-driven attention creates implementation challenges for fund managers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Environmental Management
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2025.128385
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The ESG Flow–Return Paradox: Green sentiment boosts inflows but lags in returns

Phoebe Gao, Arif Perdana
Journal of Environmental Management
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
article

The ESG Flow–Return Paradox: Green sentiment boosts inflows but lags in returns

Phoebe Gao, Arif Perdana
article en

Abstract

We examine how green sentiment affects ESG mutual fund flows and returns using Google Trends data for 107 funds (April 2019-April 2024). We document an ESG investment paradox: in months when green sentiment rises, ESG funds receive larger capital inflows yet record lower contemporaneous returns, creating a flow-performance wedge. Elevated sentiment, however, positively predicts both flows and returns in the following month. This indicates short-term momentum rather than reversal. Log-linear panel regressions reveal a "values-salience channel" where attention-driven demand creates crowding and execution frictions. Geographic effects are keyword-specific: The United States (U.S.) funds show similar flow responses to "ESG" and "Sustainability" sentiment as European funds, but experience significantly larger return declines when "Green" and "Climate" keywords trend, consistent with politicized climate discourse in U.S. markets. These findings reveal that sentiment timing matters, keyword framing shapes cross-market dynamics, and values-driven attention creates implementation challenges for fund managers.

Journal of Environmental ManagementVol. 398
Monash University Malaysia (MY), Singapore Institute of Technology (SG), Singapore Institute of Manufacturing Technology (SG), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The ESG Flow–Return Paradox: Green sentiment boosts inflows but lags in returns — Phoebe Gao, Arif Perdana · Journal of Environmental Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS