More evidence for asymmetric volatility-return correlations

· Realized returns positively correlate with volatility, when returns are positive · The correlations change from positive to negative, when returns are negative · As in Wang et al. (2017) , the evidence fits Prospect Theory’s reflection principle · The correlations show in cross-sectional and time series analyses of 353 stocks · The correlations emerge in daily, monthly, quarterly, half-yearly and yearly analyses Wang, H., Yan, J. and Yu, J. (2017) demonstrate that the risk-return correlations change from positive to negative depending on whether the stock has accrued capital gains or capital losses. The authors argue that Prospect Theory’s reflection principle provides the most convincing explanation to the asymmetry. The current note complements this evidence, reporting robust significant correlations between the absolute, but not the signed, realized returns on S&P500 stocks and estimates of the stocks’ contemporaneous volatility. The correlations consistently show at the cross-section and across time in analysis of daily, monthly, quarterly, half-yearly and yearly returns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Finance Research Open
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finr.2026.100089
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More evidence for asymmetric volatility-return correlations

Doron Sonsino, Vlad Streltsin, Yefim Roth
Finance Research Open
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

More evidence for asymmetric volatility-return correlations

Doron Sonsino, Vlad Streltsin, Yefim Roth
article en

Abstract

· Realized returns positively correlate with volatility, when returns are positive · The correlations change from positive to negative, when returns are negative · As in Wang et al. (2017) , the evidence fits Prospect Theory’s reflection principle · The correlations show in cross-sectional and time series analyses of 353 stocks · The correlations emerge in daily, monthly, quarterly, half-yearly and yearly analyses Wang, H., Yan, J. and Yu, J. (2017) demonstrate that the risk-return correlations change from positive to negative depending on whether the stock has accrued capital gains or capital losses. The authors argue that Prospect Theory’s reflection principle provides the most convincing explanation to the asymmetry. The current note complements this evidence, reporting robust significant correlations between the absolute, but not the signed, realized returns on S&P500 stocks and estimates of the stocks’ contemporaneous volatility. The correlations consistently show at the cross-section and across time in analysis of daily, monthly, quarterly, half-yearly and yearly returns.

Finance Research OpenVol. 2(1)
Cyprus University of Technology (CY), Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Limassol General Hospital (CY), University of Haifa (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

More evidence for asymmetric volatility-return correlations — Doron Sonsino, Vlad Streltsin, et al. · Finance Research Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS