Assessing Nodal Positivity in Men 70 Years of Age and Older With Clinically Node Negative Hormone-Receptor Positive Breast Cancer to Guide Axillary Intervention

BackgroundChoosing Wisely Guidelines recommend against routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for early-stage, hormone-receptor positive (HR+), clinically node negative (cN0) breast cancer (BC) in elderly women. To determine the applicability of this guideline to men, we evaluated pathologic nodal positivity (pN+) between men and women with low-risk HR+, cN0 BC.MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for patients ≥70 years who underwent surgical resection for low-risk, HR+, cN0 BC. Low-risk was defined as grade 1, cT1mi-T1c or grade 2, or cT1mi-T1b. pN+ was evaluated and compared by sex.ResultsOf 708 men and 123 855 women, 13.0% of men were pN+ compared to 7.7% of women (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Men presented with older age, more comorbidities, advanced stage, lymphovascular invasion, tumor upstaging, and a higher nodal burden (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Men were more likely to undergo axillary lymph node dissection (<i>P</i> = 0.002), but there were no differences in adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy between pN+ men and women. There were no differences in 5-year overall survival (84.0% vs 85.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.80).DiscussionMen ≥70 years with low-risk cN0 breast cancer have nearly double the rate of nodal positivity compared with women, indicating that SLNB omission cannot be directly extrapolated from female-based guidelines and should instead be considered on an individualized basis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Surgeon
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261416093
Primary Topic
Male Breast Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing Nodal Positivity in Men 70 Years of Age and Older With Clinically Node Negative Hormone-Receptor Positive Breast Cancer to Guide Axillary Intervention

Kari J. Kansal, Erin Lin, Holly M. Yong, Shaina Sedighim et al.
The American Surgeon
Male Breast Health Studies
article

Assessing Nodal Positivity in Men 70 Years of Age and Older With Clinically Node Negative Hormone-Receptor Positive Breast Cancer to Guide Axillary Intervention

Kari J. Kansal, Erin Lin, Holly M. Yong, Shaina Sedighim, Thuy B. Tran, Avneet Bhullar, Sarah W. Yuen, Karen T. Lane
article en

Abstract

BackgroundChoosing Wisely Guidelines recommend against routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for early-stage, hormone-receptor positive (HR+), clinically node negative (cN0) breast cancer (BC) in elderly women. To determine the applicability of this guideline to men, we evaluated pathologic nodal positivity (pN+) between men and women with low-risk HR+, cN0 BC.MethodsThe National Cancer Database was queried for patients ≥70 years who underwent surgical resection for low-risk, HR+, cN0 BC. Low-risk was defined as grade 1, cT1mi-T1c or grade 2, or cT1mi-T1b. pN+ was evaluated and compared by sex.ResultsOf 708 men and 123 855 women, 13.0% of men were pN+ compared to 7.7% of women (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Men presented with older age, more comorbidities, advanced stage, lymphovascular invasion, tumor upstaging, and a higher nodal burden (all <i>P</i> < 0.001). Men were more likely to undergo axillary lymph node dissection (<i>P</i> = 0.002), but there were no differences in adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy between pN+ men and women. There were no differences in 5-year overall survival (84.0% vs 85.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.80).DiscussionMen ≥70 years with low-risk cN0 breast cancer have nearly double the rate of nodal positivity compared with women, indicating that SLNB omission cannot be directly extrapolated from female-based guidelines and should instead be considered on an individualized basis.

The American Surgeon
University of California, Irvine (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Male Breast Health Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.