Prognostic Impact of Clinical Diagnosis-based Treatment in Glioblastoma Patients Aged ≥80 Years: A Single-center Cohort Study Focused on Performance Status Maintenance

In aging societies such as Japan, the number of patients aged ≥80 years with glioblastoma who are unsuited for surgery is rapidly increasing. At our institution, we adopted a therapeutic strategy based on clinical diagnosis without histological confirmation when surgery was not feasible. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the short-term outcomes and clinical value of surgical intervention and histological confirmation in this population. Patients aged ≥80 years diagnosed with glioblastoma between 2011 and 2025 were reviewed. Clinical diagnosis was applied when patients were unfit for surgery. Patient data, including age, sex, Karnofsky performance status, extent of resection, treatment options, and complications, were analyzed for associations with overall survival, Karnofsky performance status improvement, and discharge home. Among 203 cases, 31 patients (15.3%) were included. Their mean age was 84 years; the median Karnofsky performance status scores at admission and discharge were 50 and 60, respectively. Six patients underwent resection, 14 biopsy, and 11 clinical diagnosis. The clinical diagnosis group showed better functional outcomes, including improved Karnofsky performance status, shorter hospitalization, and higher discharge home rates than the biopsy group. Bevacizumab contributed significantly to these outcomes. Perioperative complications occurred in 4 patients; none recovered functionally or were discharged home. Low Karnofsky performance status at discharge was the only independent predictor of poor overall survival. Surgical intervention did not significantly affect the functional and survival outcomes. In conclusion, clinical diagnosis-based treatment, particularly with bevacizumab, could help preserve function and facilitate discharge in very elderly patients with glioblastoma. Biopsies might negatively impact the outcomes in the present cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2025-0254
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic Impact of Clinical Diagnosis-based Treatment in Glioblastoma Patients Aged ≥80 Years: A Single-center Cohort Study Focused on Performance Status Maintenance

H Nanjo, Masamichi Abe, Hiroaki SHIMIZU, Takahiro ONO et al.
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Prognostic Impact of Clinical Diagnosis-based Treatment in Glioblastoma Patients Aged ≥80 Years: A Single-center Cohort Study Focused on Performance Status Maintenance

H Nanjo, Masamichi Abe, Hiroaki SHIMIZU, Takahiro ONO, Ayana SAITO
article en

Abstract

In aging societies such as Japan, the number of patients aged ≥80 years with glioblastoma who are unsuited for surgery is rapidly increasing. At our institution, we adopted a therapeutic strategy based on clinical diagnosis without histological confirmation when surgery was not feasible. This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the short-term outcomes and clinical value of surgical intervention and histological confirmation in this population. Patients aged ≥80 years diagnosed with glioblastoma between 2011 and 2025 were reviewed. Clinical diagnosis was applied when patients were unfit for surgery. Patient data, including age, sex, Karnofsky performance status, extent of resection, treatment options, and complications, were analyzed for associations with overall survival, Karnofsky performance status improvement, and discharge home. Among 203 cases, 31 patients (15.3%) were included. Their mean age was 84 years; the median Karnofsky performance status scores at admission and discharge were 50 and 60, respectively. Six patients underwent resection, 14 biopsy, and 11 clinical diagnosis. The clinical diagnosis group showed better functional outcomes, including improved Karnofsky performance status, shorter hospitalization, and higher discharge home rates than the biopsy group. Bevacizumab contributed significantly to these outcomes. Perioperative complications occurred in 4 patients; none recovered functionally or were discharged home. Low Karnofsky performance status at discharge was the only independent predictor of poor overall survival. Surgical intervention did not significantly affect the functional and survival outcomes. In conclusion, clinical diagnosis-based treatment, particularly with bevacizumab, could help preserve function and facilitate discharge in very elderly patients with glioblastoma. Biopsies might negatively impact the outcomes in the present cohort.

Neurologia medico-chirurgicaVol. 66(3)
Akita University (JP), Akita University Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.