Strategies for Determining Residual Expansion in Concrete Cores: A Systematic Literature Review

This systematic review maps and compares experimental strategies for estimating residual expansion in concrete elements affected by internal expansive reactions (IER), with emphasis on cores extracted from in-service structures. It adopts an operational taxonomy distinguishing achieved expansion (deformation already occurred, inferred through DRI/SDT or back-analysis), potential expansion (upper limit under free conditions), and residual expansion (remaining portion estimated under controlled temperature, T, and relative humidity, RH), in addition to the free vs. restrained condition and the diagnostic vs. prognostic purpose. Seventy-eight papers were included (PRISMA), of which 14 tested cores. The limited number of core-based studies is itself a key outcome of the review, revealing that most residual expansion assessments rely on adaptations of laboratory ASR/DEF protocols rather than on standardized methods specifically developed for concrete cores extracted from in-service structures. ASR predominated, with emphasis on accelerated free tests ASTM/CSA/CPT (often at 38 °C and high RH) for reactivity characterization, and on Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées (LCPC) No. 44 and No. 67 protocols or Concrete Prism Test (CPT) adaptations to estimate residual expansion in cores. Significant heterogeneity was observed in temperature, humidity, test media, specimen dimensions, and alkali leaching treatment, as well as discrepancies between free and restrained conditions, limiting comparability and lab-to-field transferability. A minimum reporting checklist is proposed (type of IER; element history; restraint condition; T/RH/medium; anti-leaching strategy; schedule; instrumentation; uncertainty; decision criteria; raw data) and priority gaps are highlighted: standardization of core protocols, leaching control, greater use of simulated restraint, and integration of DRI/SDT–expansion curves to anchor risk estimates and guide rehabilitation decisions in real structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Buildings
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16020282
Primary Topic
Concrete Properties and Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategies for Determining Residual Expansion in Concrete Cores: A Systematic Literature Review

Joao M. P. Q. DELGADO, A. C. Azevedo, M. Martins Melo, Eudes Rocha et al.
Buildings
Concrete Properties and Behavior
article

Strategies for Determining Residual Expansion in Concrete Cores: A Systematic Literature Review

Joao M. P. Q. DELGADO, A. C. Azevedo, M. Martins Melo, Eudes Rocha, Fernando A. N. Silva
article en

Abstract

This systematic review maps and compares experimental strategies for estimating residual expansion in concrete elements affected by internal expansive reactions (IER), with emphasis on cores extracted from in-service structures. It adopts an operational taxonomy distinguishing achieved expansion (deformation already occurred, inferred through DRI/SDT or back-analysis), potential expansion (upper limit under free conditions), and residual expansion (remaining portion estimated under controlled temperature, T, and relative humidity, RH), in addition to the free vs. restrained condition and the diagnostic vs. prognostic purpose. Seventy-eight papers were included (PRISMA), of which 14 tested cores. The limited number of core-based studies is itself a key outcome of the review, revealing that most residual expansion assessments rely on adaptations of laboratory ASR/DEF protocols rather than on standardized methods specifically developed for concrete cores extracted from in-service structures. ASR predominated, with emphasis on accelerated free tests ASTM/CSA/CPT (often at 38 °C and high RH) for reactivity characterization, and on Laboratoire Central des Ponts et Chaussées (LCPC) No. 44 and No. 67 protocols or Concrete Prism Test (CPT) adaptations to estimate residual expansion in cores. Significant heterogeneity was observed in temperature, humidity, test media, specimen dimensions, and alkali leaching treatment, as well as discrepancies between free and restrained conditions, limiting comparability and lab-to-field transferability. A minimum reporting checklist is proposed (type of IER; element history; restraint condition; T/RH/medium; anti-leaching strategy; schedule; instrumentation; uncertainty; decision criteria; raw data) and priority gaps are highlighted: standardization of core protocols, leaching control, greater use of simulated restraint, and integration of DRI/SDT–expansion curves to anchor risk estimates and guide rehabilitation decisions in real structures.

BuildingsVol. 16(2)
Universidade do Porto (PT), Universidade Católica de Pernambuco (BR), Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (BR), Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Pernambuco (BR), Universidade de Pernambuco (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Concrete Properties and Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.