False-Positive PET Uptake in Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices Due to Postoperative Inflammatory Response

<b>Background:</b> Positron emission tomography (PET) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of cardiovascular infections. However, increased radiotracer uptake can also be observed in non-infectious inflammatory processes, leading to potential false positives. This study analyzed the uptake related to left atrial appendage closure devices (LAACD-AtriClip<sup>®</sup>) to determine its association with infectious or inflammatory processes. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 28 PET/CT scans from 20 patients with implanted LAACDs: 24 using <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 4 using <sup>18</sup>F-Choline (CHO). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were reviewed, and PET uptake was measured semi-quantitatively. All patients had at least 12 months of follow-up after PET imaging to assess for evidence of device-related infection. <b>Results:</b> Homogeneous PET uptake in the LAACD was observed in 93% (26/28) of the PET studies, regardless of the radiotracer used, clinical indication, or time since implantation. Clinical follow-up and laboratory findings revealed no signs of infection related to the LAACD in any case. SUV ratios did not differ significantly between the three PET indication groups (infection, neoplasia, or other; <i>p</i> = 0.46), nor between scans performed in patients with and without other confirmed infections unrelated to the LAACD (<i>p</i> = 0.37). <b>Conclusions</b>: FDG and CHO uptake in LAACDs appears to be a consistent and reproducible finding, most likely reflecting a sterile inflammatory response postoperative inflammatory uptake rather than true infection. Clear recognition of this uptake pattern is important to prevent misinterpretation and reduce the risk of false-positive PET/CT results in patients evaluated for suspected cardiovascular infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020200
Primary Topic
Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

False-Positive PET Uptake in Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices Due to Postoperative Inflammatory Response

María-Alexandra Cañas, J Llopis, C. Falces, B. Vidal et al.
Diagnostics
Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
article

False-Positive PET Uptake in Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices Due to Postoperative Inflammatory Response

María-Alexandra Cañas, J Llopis, C. Falces, B. Vidal, Marta Tormo-Ratera, G. Cuervo, J M Tolosana, José María Miró, Eduard Quintana, Marta Hernández-Meneses, Clínic Barcelona Nuclear Medicine Group, Cristina Garcia-de-la-Mària, Marta Maristany, Asunción Moreno
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> Positron emission tomography (PET) is a valuable tool in the diagnosis of cardiovascular infections. However, increased radiotracer uptake can also be observed in non-infectious inflammatory processes, leading to potential false positives. This study analyzed the uptake related to left atrial appendage closure devices (LAACD-AtriClip<sup>®</sup>) to determine its association with infectious or inflammatory processes. <b>Methods:</b> We retrospectively analyzed 28 PET/CT scans from 20 patients with implanted LAACDs: 24 using <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and 4 using <sup>18</sup>F-Choline (CHO). Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were reviewed, and PET uptake was measured semi-quantitatively. All patients had at least 12 months of follow-up after PET imaging to assess for evidence of device-related infection. <b>Results:</b> Homogeneous PET uptake in the LAACD was observed in 93% (26/28) of the PET studies, regardless of the radiotracer used, clinical indication, or time since implantation. Clinical follow-up and laboratory findings revealed no signs of infection related to the LAACD in any case. SUV ratios did not differ significantly between the three PET indication groups (infection, neoplasia, or other; <i>p</i> = 0.46), nor between scans performed in patients with and without other confirmed infections unrelated to the LAACD (<i>p</i> = 0.37). <b>Conclusions</b>: FDG and CHO uptake in LAACDs appears to be a consistent and reproducible finding, most likely reflecting a sterile inflammatory response postoperative inflammatory uptake rather than true infection. Clear recognition of this uptake pattern is important to prevent misinterpretation and reduce the risk of false-positive PET/CT results in patients evaluated for suspected cardiovascular infections.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(2)
Real Academia Española (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (ES), Biomedical Research Networking Center in Bioengineering, Biomaterials and Nanomedicine (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
European Commission, Universitat de Barcelona, Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.