Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial from China

<b>Background:</b> The prognostic superiority of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pre-CRT) over preoperative chemotherapy (pre-CT) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer remains controversial. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pre-CRT relative to those of pre-CT in this cohort. <b>Methods:</b> This open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial was conducted at 4 medical centers in China. Eligible patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 3 cycles of oxaliplatin and S-1 (SOX), followed by surgery and 3 postoperative cycles of SOX (pre-CT), or 1 cycle of SOX, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy, a second cycle of SOX, surgery, and 3 postoperative cycles of SOX (pre-CRT). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, treatment-related toxicity, and postoperative complications. <b>Results:</b> Due to premature trial termination, only 204 patients were enrolled, and an efficacy analysis was conducted on 194 eligible patients. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. The DFS and OS were indistinguishable between the 2 groups. The 3-year DFS rates were 53.6% in the pre-CRT group and 53.9% in the pre-CT group [hazard ratio (HR), 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70 to 1.50; log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.913]. The 3-year OS rates were 62.8% in the pre-CRT group and 60.5% in the pre-CT group (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.47; log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.874). The R0 resection rates were 81.0% and 74.5% in the pre-CRT and pre-CT groups, respectively. Additionally, the pCR rate was higher in the pre-CRT group (12.0%) than in the pre-CT group (2.1%). Treatment-related toxic effects were comparable between the 2 groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> This trial did not demonstrate a survival advantage for pre-CRT over pre-CT in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancer Communications
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34133/cancomm.0006
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial from China

Menglong Zhou, Xiujiang Yang, Runhua Feng, Guichao Li et al.
Cancer Communications
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Phase III Randomized Controlled Trial from China

Menglong Zhou, Xiujiang Yang, Runhua Feng, Guichao Li, Yanong Wang, Hongtao Xu, Qi Lu, Jiejie Jin, Zhongyin Yang, Weiqi Sheng, Hua Huang, Xiaowen Liu, Zhen Zhang, Hong Cai, Hui Zhu, Xuexiao Liu, Hao Ding, Ye Zhou, Min Yan
article en

Abstract

<b>Background:</b> The prognostic superiority of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pre-CRT) over preoperative chemotherapy (pre-CT) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer remains controversial. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pre-CRT relative to those of pre-CT in this cohort. <b>Methods:</b> This open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial was conducted at 4 medical centers in China. Eligible patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 3 cycles of oxaliplatin and S-1 (SOX), followed by surgery and 3 postoperative cycles of SOX (pre-CT), or 1 cycle of SOX, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy, a second cycle of SOX, surgery, and 3 postoperative cycles of SOX (pre-CRT). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, treatment-related toxicity, and postoperative complications. <b>Results:</b> Due to premature trial termination, only 204 patients were enrolled, and an efficacy analysis was conducted on 194 eligible patients. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. The DFS and OS were indistinguishable between the 2 groups. The 3-year DFS rates were 53.6% in the pre-CRT group and 53.9% in the pre-CT group [hazard ratio (HR), 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70 to 1.50; log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.913]. The 3-year OS rates were 62.8% in the pre-CRT group and 60.5% in the pre-CT group (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.47; log-rank <i>P</i> = 0.874). The R0 resection rates were 81.0% and 74.5% in the pre-CRT and pre-CT groups, respectively. Additionally, the pCR rate was higher in the pre-CRT group (12.0%) than in the pre-CT group (2.1%). Treatment-related toxic effects were comparable between the 2 groups. <b>Conclusion:</b> This trial did not demonstrate a survival advantage for pre-CRT over pre-CT in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.

Cancer CommunicationsVol. 46
Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN), Fudan University (CN), Ruijin Hospital (CN), Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Huadong Hospital (CN), Lishui Central Hospital (CN), Shanghai Institute of Hematology (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.