Swift SNPs: Evaluating Rapid DNA Extraction Methods for Scalable Genotyping in Aquaculture

Efficient DNA extraction is critical for high-throughput genotyping in aquaculture breeding programs, where cost, speed, and data quality must be balanced. This study compared five rapid extraction methods-HotSHOT, Chelex, Tween, wax-coated dipstick, and bare dipstick-against a conventional cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol for use in Lates calcarifer (barramundi) genotyping. DNA yield, purity, and integrity were measured by spectrophotometry, fluorometry, and Agilent TapeStation. Performance was tested in microsatellite genotyping, tyrosinase-related protein 1b (TYRP1b) gene sequencing, and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping on the Tecan Allegro Targeted Resequencing V2 platform. CTAB produced the highest-quality DNA (30.3 ± 17.4 ng/µL; A260/A280 = 1.91 ± 0.26; DIN = 8.78) with reliable results in all assays. Despite lower quality (1.07 ± 0.30 ng/µL; A260/A280 = 1.44 ± 0.18; DIN ≈ 1.6), HotSHOT performed similarly: SNP concordance with CTAB averaged 82.3%, microsatellite amplification reached 93.1% (vs. 99.3% for CTAB), and all HotSHOT samples yielded high-quality TYRP1b sequences. Chelex, Tween, and dipstick methods had lower success, likely due to inadequate yield and purity. HotSHOT was the most effective rapid alternative to CTAB, with significantly higher SNP concordance (82.3% vs. others; p < 0.005). These results show that method choice strongly influences target-capture genotyping success and support HotSHOT as a cost-effective, scalable option for aquaculture genomics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marine Biotechnology
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-025-10561-7
Primary Topic
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Swift SNPs: Evaluating Rapid DNA Extraction Methods for Scalable Genotyping in Aquaculture

Emily Rhodes, Julie Goldsbury, David B. Jones, Dean Jerry et al.
Marine Biotechnology
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
article

Swift SNPs: Evaluating Rapid DNA Extraction Methods for Scalable Genotyping in Aquaculture

Emily Rhodes, Julie Goldsbury, David B. Jones, Dean Jerry, Nga Vu
article en

Abstract

Efficient DNA extraction is critical for high-throughput genotyping in aquaculture breeding programs, where cost, speed, and data quality must be balanced. This study compared five rapid extraction methods-HotSHOT, Chelex, Tween, wax-coated dipstick, and bare dipstick-against a conventional cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) protocol for use in Lates calcarifer (barramundi) genotyping. DNA yield, purity, and integrity were measured by spectrophotometry, fluorometry, and Agilent TapeStation. Performance was tested in microsatellite genotyping, tyrosinase-related protein 1b (TYRP1b) gene sequencing, and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping on the Tecan Allegro Targeted Resequencing V2 platform. CTAB produced the highest-quality DNA (30.3 ± 17.4 ng/µL; A260/A280 = 1.91 ± 0.26; DIN = 8.78) with reliable results in all assays. Despite lower quality (1.07 ± 0.30 ng/µL; A260/A280 = 1.44 ± 0.18; DIN ≈ 1.6), HotSHOT performed similarly: SNP concordance with CTAB averaged 82.3%, microsatellite amplification reached 93.1% (vs. 99.3% for CTAB), and all HotSHOT samples yielded high-quality TYRP1b sequences. Chelex, Tween, and dipstick methods had lower success, likely due to inadequate yield and purity. HotSHOT was the most effective rapid alternative to CTAB, with significantly higher SNP concordance (82.3% vs. others; p < 0.005). These results show that method choice strongly influences target-capture genotyping success and support HotSHOT as a cost-effective, scalable option for aquaculture genomics.

Marine BiotechnologyVol. 28(1)
James Cook University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Animal Genetics and Reproduction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.