Real-life impact of clinical metagenomics in the intensive care unit: a multicenter retrospective study in greater paris area hospitals

Infection are the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, yet conventional microbiological methods frequently fail to identify the causative pathogen. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is an emerging, unbiased, pan-pathogen diagnostic tool. However, its real-world microbiological and clinical impact in the ICU remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to assess the microbiological yield and clinical impact of mNGS when implemented in routine ICU practice. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted across ten tertiary-care ICUs in the Greater Paris area between January 2018 and April 2024. All patients for whom an mNGS analysis was requested by clinicians from a microbiological sample were included. Any additional pathogens identified by mNGS were independently classified as causative, possibly causative, or non-causative by two reviewers. The independent reviewers also categorised therapeutic changes attributable to mNGS as escalation, de-escalation, discontinuation, or other decision support. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer. A total of 144 mNGS analyses were performed in 132 critically ill patients (median age 55 years), 31% of whom were immunocompromised. The number of mNGS analyses requested increased each year. The most common sample types were cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (n = 60/144, 41.7%) and pleural fluid (n = 21/144, 14.6%). Pathogens were identified by mNGS in 58 samples (40.3%), with a higher yield in pleural fluid (n = 11/21, 52.4%) than in CSF (n = 16/60, 26.6%). Of the 107 pathogens identified, 43 (40.2%) were detected exclusively by mNGS, notably anaerobic bacteria in pleural fluid and abscess samples. mNGS identified an additional pathogen in 34 cases (25.8%) of the 132 patients included, which was deemed causative in 18 cases (13.6%). mNGS findings influenced therapeutic management in seven patients (5.3%) including five cases of antibiotic de-escalation, one appropriate antibiotic escalation, and one case of clinical decision support. In this real-life ICU cohort, mNGS identified additional pathogens in 25.8% of patients, deemed causative in 18 cases (13.6%), and a direct therapeutic impact was observed in 5.3% of cases. However, the median turnaround time of 14 days likely limited its clinical impact. Further studies are needed to better define the role of mNGS in the diagnostic management of critically ill patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Care
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05764-2
Primary Topic
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-life impact of clinical metagenomics in the intensive care unit: a multicenter retrospective study in greater paris area hospitals

Pierre Cappy, C Rodriguez, Paul‐Louis Woerther, S. Benghanem et al.
Critical Care
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
article

Real-life impact of clinical metagenomics in the intensive care unit: a multicenter retrospective study in greater paris area hospitals

Pierre Cappy, C Rodriguez, Paul‐Louis Woerther, S. Benghanem, Cécile Angebault, R. Sonneville, N. De Prost, Pierre Bay, Taï Pham, Damien Contou, Guillaume Voiriot, Keyvan Razazi, Giovanna Melica, Marc Pineton de Chambrun, Armand Mekontso Dessap, Matthieu Petit, Nicolas Mongardon
article en

Abstract

Infection are the leading cause of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, yet conventional microbiological methods frequently fail to identify the causative pathogen. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) is an emerging, unbiased, pan-pathogen diagnostic tool. However, its real-world microbiological and clinical impact in the ICU remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to assess the microbiological yield and clinical impact of mNGS when implemented in routine ICU practice. This retrospective multicenter study was conducted across ten tertiary-care ICUs in the Greater Paris area between January 2018 and April 2024. All patients for whom an mNGS analysis was requested by clinicians from a microbiological sample were included. Any additional pathogens identified by mNGS were independently classified as causative, possibly causative, or non-causative by two reviewers. The independent reviewers also categorised therapeutic changes attributable to mNGS as escalation, de-escalation, discontinuation, or other decision support. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer. A total of 144 mNGS analyses were performed in 132 critically ill patients (median age 55 years), 31% of whom were immunocompromised. The number of mNGS analyses requested increased each year. The most common sample types were cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (n = 60/144, 41.7%) and pleural fluid (n = 21/144, 14.6%). Pathogens were identified by mNGS in 58 samples (40.3%), with a higher yield in pleural fluid (n = 11/21, 52.4%) than in CSF (n = 16/60, 26.6%). Of the 107 pathogens identified, 43 (40.2%) were detected exclusively by mNGS, notably anaerobic bacteria in pleural fluid and abscess samples. mNGS identified an additional pathogen in 34 cases (25.8%) of the 132 patients included, which was deemed causative in 18 cases (13.6%). mNGS findings influenced therapeutic management in seven patients (5.3%) including five cases of antibiotic de-escalation, one appropriate antibiotic escalation, and one case of clinical decision support. In this real-life ICU cohort, mNGS identified additional pathogens in 25.8% of patients, deemed causative in 18 cases (13.6%), and a direct therapeutic impact was observed in 5.3% of cases. However, the median turnaround time of 14 days likely limited its clinical impact. Further studies are needed to better define the role of mNGS in the diagnostic management of critically ill patients.

Critical CareVol. 30(1)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Université Paris-Sud (FR), Délégation Paris 5 (FR), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (FR), Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (FR), Université Paris-Est Créteil (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Université Paris-Saclay (FR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Hôpital Cochin (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Saint-Antoine (FR), Centre de recherche en Epidémiologie et Santé des Populations (FR), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri-Mondor (FR), Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy (FR), Institut Cochin (FR), Hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard (FR), Université Gustave Eiffel (FR), Fondation pour l’innovation en Cadiométabolisme et Nutrition (FR), Institut Mondor de Recherche Biomédicale (FR), Bicêtre Hospital (FR), Hôpital Tenon (FR), SoLID : SOrbonne study group for Lung Infectious Diseases (FR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Nosocomial Infections in ICU
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.