Past lines, present divides: mapping the biography of boundaries in protected area governance

Protected areas (PAs) represent conservation boundaries with differentiated governance regimes. Understanding their historical emergence is crucial for evaluating their current conservation role and future impact. In this article I examine how the history of boundaries shapes current conservation practices and processes surrounding PAs and the relationships among different stakeholder groups that are part of governance arrangements in these areas, including conflicts and animosity toward groups from across these boundaries. To this end, adjacent sustainable use PAs were selected as case studies. Through 30 semi-structured interviews with co-management stakeholders, I explore perceptions about PAs, their boundaries, and related disputes. While nearby users are excluded from decision making in deliberative councils, this exclusion has not fully materialized in territorial and resource use practices. The historical development of PA boundaries illuminates “othering” processes and tensions arising from transboundary resource use that local governance must address. Temporality plays a role in both the emergence and avoidance of resource disputes, highlighting the need to understand temporal boundaries. The idea of a “biography of boundaries” is used to describe the history of cross-boundary movements, offering important insights for transboundary governance. This biographical approach to understanding boundaries is essential for preventing conflicts and ensuring PAs effectively achieve their dual goals of biodiversity conservation and sustainable human livelihoods. Such an understanding includes an insight into how different actor groups create new identities of themselves and others and offers a glimpse at how boundaries might impact conservation in the future. By recognizing how boundaries have evolved and how they shape stakeholder identities and relationships, conservation governance can better address the complex social dynamics that influence PA effectiveness.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Ecology and Society
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5751/es-16380-310105
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Past lines, present divides: mapping the biography of boundaries in protected area governance

Rebecca Borges
Ecology and Society
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Past lines, present divides: mapping the biography of boundaries in protected area governance

Rebecca Borges
article en

Abstract

Protected areas (PAs) represent conservation boundaries with differentiated governance regimes. Understanding their historical emergence is crucial for evaluating their current conservation role and future impact. In this article I examine how the history of boundaries shapes current conservation practices and processes surrounding PAs and the relationships among different stakeholder groups that are part of governance arrangements in these areas, including conflicts and animosity toward groups from across these boundaries. To this end, adjacent sustainable use PAs were selected as case studies. Through 30 semi-structured interviews with co-management stakeholders, I explore perceptions about PAs, their boundaries, and related disputes. While nearby users are excluded from decision making in deliberative councils, this exclusion has not fully materialized in territorial and resource use practices. The historical development of PA boundaries illuminates “othering” processes and tensions arising from transboundary resource use that local governance must address. Temporality plays a role in both the emergence and avoidance of resource disputes, highlighting the need to understand temporal boundaries. The idea of a “biography of boundaries” is used to describe the history of cross-boundary movements, offering important insights for transboundary governance. This biographical approach to understanding boundaries is essential for preventing conflicts and ensuring PAs effectively achieve their dual goals of biodiversity conservation and sustainable human livelihoods. Such an understanding includes an insight into how different actor groups create new identities of themselves and others and offers a glimpse at how boundaries might impact conservation in the future. By recognizing how boundaries have evolved and how they shape stakeholder identities and relationships, conservation governance can better address the complex social dynamics that influence PA effectiveness.

Ecology and SocietyVol. 31(1)
Universidade Federal do Pará
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Past lines, present divides: mapping the biography of boundaries in protected area governance — Rebecca Borges · Ecology and Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS