Dietary Amylose/Amylopectin Ratio Modulated Growth Performance, Intestinal Health, and Lipid Metabolism in Goslings Fed Low-Protein Diets

This study investigated the effects of amylose/amylopectin (AM/AP) ratios in low-protein (LP) diets on the growth performance, fat deposition, and nutrient utilization in goslings. A total of 288 healthy, 35-day-old male Jiangnan White Geese were randomly divided into four treatment groups: one group fed a normal protein diet (16%) with an AM/AP ratio of 0.34 (NPR<sub>0.34</sub>), and three groups fed low protein diets (14%) with different AM/AP ratios (LPR<sub>0.26</sub>, LPR<sub>0.34</sub>, LPR<sub>0.44</sub>). Each group consisted of six replicates, with 12 geese per replicate, and they were fed for 28 days. The results showed that the body weight at 63 days and average daily gain (ADG) of the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group geese were significantly higher than those of the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.01), while the feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The abdominal and mesenteric fat contents were lower in the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group than in the LPR<sub>0.26</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas the breast and leg muscle yields were higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The breast muscle redness (a*) of the LPR<sub>0.34</sub> and LPR<sub>0.44</sub> groups was higher than in the NPR<sub>0.34</sub> group at 45 min (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The levels of C6:0, C8:0, C11:0, C12:0, and C13:0 in breast muscle saturated fatty acids (SFAs) of the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group were higher, while that of C18:0 was lower compared with the LPR<sub>0.26</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The serum total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TGs) in the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group were lower than in the LPR<sub>0.26</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Hepatic lipase (HL) activity was significantly lower in the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Regarding hepatic fatty acids, the levels of butyric acid (C4:0), lauric acid (C12:0), and nervonic acid (C24:1) were lower in the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group than in the LPR<sub>0.26</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activities, or nutrient utilization among the groups. (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, adjusting the AM/AP ratio to 0.44 in a low-protein diet improved growth performance, regulated lipid metabolism, and maintained intestinal function in goslings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16020189
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
33.72

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dietary Amylose/Amylopectin Ratio Modulated Growth Performance, Intestinal Health, and Lipid Metabolism in Goslings Fed Low-Protein Diets

Xiyuan Xing, Xuan Li, Zhenghai Yang, Zhiyue Wang et al.
1 citations
Animals
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
33.72
article

Dietary Amylose/Amylopectin Ratio Modulated Growth Performance, Intestinal Health, and Lipid Metabolism in Goslings Fed Low-Protein Diets

Xiyuan Xing, Xuan Li, Zhenghai Yang, Zhiyue Wang, Haiming Yang, Xucheng Zheng
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study investigated the effects of amylose/amylopectin (AM/AP) ratios in low-protein (LP) diets on the growth performance, fat deposition, and nutrient utilization in goslings. A total of 288 healthy, 35-day-old male Jiangnan White Geese were randomly divided into four treatment groups: one group fed a normal protein diet (16%) with an AM/AP ratio of 0.34 (NPR<sub>0.34</sub>), and three groups fed low protein diets (14%) with different AM/AP ratios (LPR<sub>0.26</sub>, LPR<sub>0.34</sub>, LPR<sub>0.44</sub>). Each group consisted of six replicates, with 12 geese per replicate, and they were fed for 28 days. The results showed that the body weight at 63 days and average daily gain (ADG) of the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group geese were significantly higher than those of the other groups (<i>p</i> < 0.01), while the feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) was lower (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The abdominal and mesenteric fat contents were lower in the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group than in the LPR<sub>0.26</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.05), whereas the breast and leg muscle yields were higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The breast muscle redness (a*) of the LPR<sub>0.34</sub> and LPR<sub>0.44</sub> groups was higher than in the NPR<sub>0.34</sub> group at 45 min (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The levels of C6:0, C8:0, C11:0, C12:0, and C13:0 in breast muscle saturated fatty acids (SFAs) of the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group were higher, while that of C18:0 was lower compared with the LPR<sub>0.26</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The serum total cholesterol (TC) and triglycerides (TGs) in the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group were lower than in the LPR<sub>0.26</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Hepatic lipase (HL) activity was significantly lower in the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.01). Regarding hepatic fatty acids, the levels of butyric acid (C4:0), lauric acid (C12:0), and nervonic acid (C24:1) were lower in the LPR<sub>0.44</sub> group than in the LPR<sub>0.26</sub> group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). No significant differences were observed in intestinal morphology, digestive enzyme activities, or nutrient utilization among the groups. (<i>p</i> > 0.05). In conclusion, adjusting the AM/AP ratio to 0.44 in a low-protein diet improved growth performance, regulated lipid metabolism, and maintained intestinal function in goslings.

AnimalsVol. 16(2)
Yangzhou University (CN)
Earmarked Fund for China Agriculture Research System
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Animal Nutrition and Physiology
33.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.