Evaluating the dosimetric impact of intrafraction shifts on critical OAR doses for spine SBRT using an In-House simulator

This study evaluated the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion during spine SBRT by developing a novel dose deviation simulator capable of analyzing translations and rotations in all six degrees of freedom. We retrospectively assessed the treatment plans from 18 spine SBRT patients treated at our institution with 24 Gy in two fractions by simulating shifts of 0.5-2 mm (translations) and 0.5-2° (rotations), and calculating changes in D0.03 cc to spinal cord, cord PRV, and thecal sac. Translational shifts, particularly in the vertical direction, produced the greatest observed deviations, with a 2 mm vertical shift yielding median increases, reported as percent of prescription dose, of 20.6% (4.93 Gy) to thecal sac D0.03 cc and 6.5% (1.55 Gy) to spinal cord D0.03 cc. Our simulator's accuracy was validated against treatment planning system-based forward calculations, showing mean differences of -1.3% ± 3.5% between the two systems. This study provides practical reference values to assist clinicians in rapidly evaluating the clinical significance of observed intrafraction motion. These findings may streamline decision-making during treatment and highlight the importance of precise positioning and motion monitoring in spine SBRT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tipsro.2026.100378
Primary Topic
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the dosimetric impact of intrafraction shifts on critical OAR doses for spine SBRT using an In-House simulator

Colbey W. Freeman, Gabrielle W. Peters, Shibu Anamalayil, Anish A. Butala et al.
Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation Oncology
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
article

Evaluating the dosimetric impact of intrafraction shifts on critical OAR doses for spine SBRT using an In-House simulator

Colbey W. Freeman, Gabrielle W. Peters, Shibu Anamalayil, Anish A. Butala, Ryan Scheuermann, Alvand Hassankhani, Emily Hubley, Anthony Kassaee, D. Scott Alexander, Ian Messing, Brandon Koger, Neil Malhotra
article en

Abstract

This study evaluated the dosimetric impact of intrafraction motion during spine SBRT by developing a novel dose deviation simulator capable of analyzing translations and rotations in all six degrees of freedom. We retrospectively assessed the treatment plans from 18 spine SBRT patients treated at our institution with 24 Gy in two fractions by simulating shifts of 0.5-2 mm (translations) and 0.5-2° (rotations), and calculating changes in D0.03 cc to spinal cord, cord PRV, and thecal sac. Translational shifts, particularly in the vertical direction, produced the greatest observed deviations, with a 2 mm vertical shift yielding median increases, reported as percent of prescription dose, of 20.6% (4.93 Gy) to thecal sac D0.03 cc and 6.5% (1.55 Gy) to spinal cord D0.03 cc. Our simulator's accuracy was validated against treatment planning system-based forward calculations, showing mean differences of -1.3% ± 3.5% between the two systems. This study provides practical reference values to assist clinicians in rapidly evaluating the clinical significance of observed intrafraction motion. These findings may streamline decision-making during treatment and highlight the importance of precise positioning and motion monitoring in spine SBRT.

Technical Innovations & Patient Support in Radiation OncologyVol. 37
Dartmouth College (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.