Clinical Trial Endpoints for Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease

Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pCD), a structurally damaging condition of the anorectum and perineum, can result in debilitating symptoms and significantly impair quality of life. The lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with primary endpoints specifically validated for pCD has contributed to suboptimal treatment recommendations. This review discusses considerations for pCD RCTs and provides expert opinion on current endpoints in the context of guidance from regulatory authorities. A challenge designing pCD RCTs is that placebo response rates and treatment effect sizes can change over time and are influenced by surgical and medical interventions that are often required pre-enrollment. Analysis of the main endpoint in 10 pCD phase III/IV RCTs and post hoc analyses highlighted the lack of universal definitions for clinical fistula response/remission. Most trials assessed clinical response based on a physical examination, which has not been formally validated, and one used a combined clinical and radiological response endpoint. Five endpoints evaluating fistula closure/healing, clinical remission, and patient-reported outcomes were deemed to reflect clinically meaningful changes for patients. However, none were considered to be reproducible or show a reasonable effect size with low placebo background noise or response rates. Based on our evaluation, future trials should use coprimary clinical and radiologic assessments to capture both how the patient feels and an objective measure of disease activity. These findings reinforce the need for clearly defined, objective, and standardized endpoints for pCD clinical trials that will enable evaluation of novel therapies to improve patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003906
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
39.15
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Trial Endpoints for Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease

Raja Atreya, Jordi Rimola, Ailsa Hart, Phil Tozer et al.
1 citations
The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
39.15
article

Clinical Trial Endpoints for Perianal Fistulizing Crohn's Disease

Raja Atreya, Jordi Rimola, Ailsa Hart, Phil Tozer, Christianne J Buskens, Walter Reinisch, Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet, Florian Rieder, Vipul Jairath
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (pCD), a structurally damaging condition of the anorectum and perineum, can result in debilitating symptoms and significantly impair quality of life. The lack of high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with primary endpoints specifically validated for pCD has contributed to suboptimal treatment recommendations. This review discusses considerations for pCD RCTs and provides expert opinion on current endpoints in the context of guidance from regulatory authorities. A challenge designing pCD RCTs is that placebo response rates and treatment effect sizes can change over time and are influenced by surgical and medical interventions that are often required pre-enrollment. Analysis of the main endpoint in 10 pCD phase III/IV RCTs and post hoc analyses highlighted the lack of universal definitions for clinical fistula response/remission. Most trials assessed clinical response based on a physical examination, which has not been formally validated, and one used a combined clinical and radiological response endpoint. Five endpoints evaluating fistula closure/healing, clinical remission, and patient-reported outcomes were deemed to reflect clinically meaningful changes for patients. However, none were considered to be reproducible or show a reasonable effect size with low placebo background noise or response rates. Based on our evaluation, future trials should use coprimary clinical and radiologic assessments to capture both how the patient feels and an objective measure of disease activity. These findings reinforce the need for clearly defined, objective, and standardized endpoints for pCD clinical trials that will enable evaluation of novel therapies to improve patient outcomes.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
Western University (CA), Cleveland Clinic (US), Inserm (FR), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), St. Mark's Hospital (US), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), St Mark's Hospital (GB), Nutrition-Génétique et Exposition aux Risques Environnementaux (FR), Imperial College London (GB), Medical University of Vienna (AT), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
39.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.