Conceptualising undervaccinated populations in high-income settings: why consensus and clarity matter
Routine immunisation coverage across high income countries is challenged by ongoing decline/attrition and persistent disparities.1 Terminology to describe groups with suboptimal vaccination rates has evolved from “hard-to-reach,” “marginalised,” and “disadvantaged” to “underserved.” Despite differing implicit assumptions, these terms are often used interchangeably, obscuring their distinct biases. Clarity in terminology is important for shaping programme delivery and outreach methods in ways that avoid stigmatising communities.
Authors
- Ben Kasstan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9020-2954)
- Michael R. Edelstein (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2293-0674)
- Michael J. Deml (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2224-8173)
- Ifrah Mohamed Ibrahim
- Sibylle Herzig van Wees
- Sandra Mounier-Jack
Institutions
- University of Geneva (CH)
- Bar-Ilan University (IL)
- University of Basel (CH)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
- Kantonsspital Baselland (CH)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
- Published
- 2026-01-09
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2025.101586
- Primary Topic
- Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00