Developing Technical Literacy for Business School Students Studying Innovation

This study examines how business school students with no programming background develop technical literacy through a newly introduced Digital Innovation course. Addressing a gap in non-STEM education research—where little is known about how social science students experience technical literacy interventions—we draw on qualitative data from group exam reflections (n = 14) and mid-semester survey responses (n = 7). Using an inductive thematic analysis, the study investigates how students perceived, navigated, and made sense of foundational coding activities. Four themes emerged: (1) Perceived value of coding and technical literacy, (2) Hidden gaps in foundational technical literacy, (3) AI as a cognitive and pedagogical scaffold and (4) Emerging technical competence and identity formation. Framed within theories of digital literacy and constructivist learning, the findings show how limited, scaffolded exposure to web development can shift students from digital consumption toward novice digital production. The study contributes empirical insight into how coding can be meaningfully embedded within business school curricula and offers pedagogical recommendations for designing accessible technical literacy interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010100
Primary Topic
Gender and Technology in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing Technical Literacy for Business School Students Studying Innovation

Alexander Stene Utne, Håvar Brattli, Matthew Lynch
Education Sciences
Gender and Technology in Education
article

Developing Technical Literacy for Business School Students Studying Innovation

Alexander Stene Utne, Håvar Brattli, Matthew Lynch
article en

Abstract

This study examines how business school students with no programming background develop technical literacy through a newly introduced Digital Innovation course. Addressing a gap in non-STEM education research—where little is known about how social science students experience technical literacy interventions—we draw on qualitative data from group exam reflections (n = 14) and mid-semester survey responses (n = 7). Using an inductive thematic analysis, the study investigates how students perceived, navigated, and made sense of foundational coding activities. Four themes emerged: (1) Perceived value of coding and technical literacy, (2) Hidden gaps in foundational technical literacy, (3) AI as a cognitive and pedagogical scaffold and (4) Emerging technical competence and identity formation. Framed within theories of digital literacy and constructivist learning, the findings show how limited, scaffolded exposure to web development can shift students from digital consumption toward novice digital production. The study contributes empirical insight into how coding can be meaningfully embedded within business school curricula and offers pedagogical recommendations for designing accessible technical literacy interventions.

Education SciencesVol. 16(1)
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO), Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate (NO), 657 Oslo (NO), UiT The Arctic University of Norway (NO)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Gender and Technology in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Developing Technical Literacy for Business School Students Studying Innovation — Alexander Stene Utne, Håvar Brattli, et al. · Education Sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS