Safety and feasibility of a dexterity-enhancing handheld robot for endoscopic neurosurgery: an in-vivo animal study (IDEAL stage 0)

Minimally invasive neurosurgery is limited by narrow corridors and restricted instrument dexterity. To overcome these challenges, we developed a handheld robotic system to enhance surgical performance. This preclinical in vivo study (IDEAL Stage 0) presents the first evaluation of the system across three neurosurgical approaches - subfrontal, transparietal, and supracerebellar in two ovine models. Three robotic end-effectors (dissector, forceps, curette) were assessed for safety and feasibility. Safety was confirmed via intraoperative monitoring and necropsy, with no device-related morbidity, mortality, or adverse events. All predefined tasks were feasible; the percentage of tasks rated “very easy” or “easy” was 81% (dissector), 96% (forceps), and 100% (curette). Surgeons reported high usability, suggesting refinements related to instrument sharpness and retraction force. These results support the safety and feasibility of the system and highlight its potential to improve surgical precision while preserving surgeon autonomy. The findings justify further refinement and progression to early human studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Robotics
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44182-025-00068-7
Primary Topic
Soft Robotics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Safety and feasibility of a dexterity-enhancing handheld robot for endoscopic neurosurgery: an in-vivo animal study (IDEAL stage 0)

John Hanrahan, Hani J. Marcus, Joachim Starup-Hansen
npj Robotics
Soft Robotics and Applications
article

Safety and feasibility of a dexterity-enhancing handheld robot for endoscopic neurosurgery: an in-vivo animal study (IDEAL stage 0)

John Hanrahan, Hani J. Marcus, Joachim Starup-Hansen
article en

Abstract

Minimally invasive neurosurgery is limited by narrow corridors and restricted instrument dexterity. To overcome these challenges, we developed a handheld robotic system to enhance surgical performance. This preclinical in vivo study (IDEAL Stage 0) presents the first evaluation of the system across three neurosurgical approaches - subfrontal, transparietal, and supracerebellar in two ovine models. Three robotic end-effectors (dissector, forceps, curette) were assessed for safety and feasibility. Safety was confirmed via intraoperative monitoring and necropsy, with no device-related morbidity, mortality, or adverse events. All predefined tasks were feasible; the percentage of tasks rated “very easy” or “easy” was 81% (dissector), 96% (forceps), and 100% (curette). Surgeons reported high usability, suggesting refinements related to instrument sharpness and retraction force. These results support the safety and feasibility of the system and highlight its potential to improve surgical precision while preserving surgeon autonomy. The findings justify further refinement and progression to early human studies.

npj RoboticsVol. 4(1)
Hawassa University (ET), Universitas Pandanaran (ID), National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB), University College London (GB)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, University College London
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Soft Robotics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.