Multimodal multicentre investigation of diagnostic and prognostic markers in disorders of consciousness

Severely brain-injured patients may enter a spectrum of conditions collectively known as disorders of consciousness. This spectrum includes clinical conditions such as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state, where the behavioural assessment of consciousness can often be deceptive. To bridge this dissociation, neuroimaging techniques are employed to identify the residual brain functions. Each neuroimaging modality imperfectly captures distinct aspects of brain preservation-functional, anatomical, or both. In this study, we adopt a comprehensive approach by integrating the neurophysiology and neuroimaging modalities available from the standard and advanced clinical assessments through interpretable machine learning. The electrophysiological modalities included high-density EEG (resting state and task), whereas neuroimaging modalities included anatomical and resting-state functional MRI, diffusion MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Our investigation reveals that specific modalities, such as functional assessments, provide comprehensive insights into the currently evaluated state of consciousness, the diagnosis of the patients. Conversely, structural modalities offer valuable information about the patient's evolution within the consciousness spectrum. We validate the proposed analysis with data coming from other centres with different acquisition parameters. Importantly, we demonstrate that model performance improves with an increase in the number of modalities. We observe a higher inter-modality disagreement for minimally conscious state patients and those patients who improve. Lastly, we observe a difference in feature importances between diagnosis and prognosis, with an interaction between modality and anatomical structures: some subcortical markers tend to contribute more to prognosis, while other cortical markers are more informative for diagnosis. This integrative multimodal and machine learning methodology presents a promising avenue for a more nuanced understanding of disorders of consciousness, contributing to enhanced diagnostic precision, prognostic capabilities and the personalization of rehabilitative strategies in clinical practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain
Published
2025-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaf412
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multimodal multicentre investigation of diagnostic and prognostic markers in disorders of consciousness

Emilia Fló Rama, Jacobo Diego Sitt, Chiara Valota, Theresa Raiser et al.
Brain
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Multimodal multicentre investigation of diagnostic and prognostic markers in disorders of consciousness

Emilia Fló Rama, Jacobo Diego Sitt, Chiara Valota, Theresa Raiser, Aude Sangaré, Martin Rosenfelder, Başak Türker, Anira Escrichs, A Berlis, Benoît Béranger, Enzo Tagliazucchi, Mario Carmine Emiliano Rosanova, Lina Willacker, Laouen Belloli, Tiziana Atzori, Dragana Manasova, Yonatan Sanz Perl, Brigitte Charlotte Kaufmann, Gustavo Deco, Anat Arzi, Bertrand Hermann, Tina Luther, Esteban Munoz-Musat, Angela Comanducci, Chiara Camilla Derchi, Kristina Krüger, Nadya Pyatigorskaya, Vincent Perlbarg, Andreas Bender, Michele Colombo, Francesca Baglio, Constantin Lapa, Alice Pirastru
article en

Abstract

Severely brain-injured patients may enter a spectrum of conditions collectively known as disorders of consciousness. This spectrum includes clinical conditions such as unresponsive wakefulness syndrome or minimally conscious state, where the behavioural assessment of consciousness can often be deceptive. To bridge this dissociation, neuroimaging techniques are employed to identify the residual brain functions. Each neuroimaging modality imperfectly captures distinct aspects of brain preservation-functional, anatomical, or both. In this study, we adopt a comprehensive approach by integrating the neurophysiology and neuroimaging modalities available from the standard and advanced clinical assessments through interpretable machine learning. The electrophysiological modalities included high-density EEG (resting state and task), whereas neuroimaging modalities included anatomical and resting-state functional MRI, diffusion MRI and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Our investigation reveals that specific modalities, such as functional assessments, provide comprehensive insights into the currently evaluated state of consciousness, the diagnosis of the patients. Conversely, structural modalities offer valuable information about the patient's evolution within the consciousness spectrum. We validate the proposed analysis with data coming from other centres with different acquisition parameters. Importantly, we demonstrate that model performance improves with an increase in the number of modalities. We observe a higher inter-modality disagreement for minimally conscious state patients and those patients who improve. Lastly, we observe a difference in feature importances between diagnosis and prognosis, with an interaction between modality and anatomical structures: some subcortical markers tend to contribute more to prognosis, while other cortical markers are more informative for diagnosis. This integrative multimodal and machine learning methodology presents a promising avenue for a more nuanced understanding of disorders of consciousness, contributing to enhanced diagnostic precision, prognostic capabilities and the personalization of rehabilitative strategies in clinical practice.

Brain
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES), Augsburg University (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Allen Institute for Brain Science (US), Inserm (FR), Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), University of Augsburg (DE), University of Milan (IT), Universität Ulm (DE), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Université Paris Cité (FR), Adolfo Ibáñez University (CL), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), University Hospital Augsburg (DE), Sorbonne Université (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou (FR), Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation (IT), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (AR), Institut de Psychiatrie et Neurosciences de Paris (FR), Therapiezentrum Burgau (DE), Institut du Cerveau (FR), Technische Hochschule Ulm (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.