How Stakes Vary and Influence Crisis Decision‐Making: Evidence From Local Government Managers During <scp>COVID</scp> ‐19

ABSTRACT How does a crisis influence decision‐making in public organisations? Crisis decision‐making, by definition, occurs under conditions of uncertainty, urgency and high stakes. While high stakes are an inherent feature of any crisis, this article argues that the level of stakes varies, and shapes the decision‐making approach. The literature on crisis decision‐making highlights two key dimensions: a spectrum from principled to pragmatic approaches, and a range from centralised to decentralised decision‐making. Based on survey data from Danish local government managers, the article finds that COVID‐19 decision‐making was more principled and centralised among managers working in high‐stakes policy areas and among those more actively engaged in a central crisis management team. The article theorises and empirically tests how variation in perceived stakes influences crisis decision‐making approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Administration
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.70051
Primary Topic
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Stakes Vary and Influence Crisis Decision‐Making: Evidence From Local Government Managers During COVID ‐19

Søren Kjær Foged, Kurt Houlberg
Social Policy and Administration
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
article

How Stakes Vary and Influence Crisis Decision‐Making: Evidence From Local Government Managers During COVID ‐19

Søren Kjær Foged, Kurt Houlberg
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT How does a crisis influence decision‐making in public organisations? Crisis decision‐making, by definition, occurs under conditions of uncertainty, urgency and high stakes. While high stakes are an inherent feature of any crisis, this article argues that the level of stakes varies, and shapes the decision‐making approach. The literature on crisis decision‐making highlights two key dimensions: a spectrum from principled to pragmatic approaches, and a range from centralised to decentralised decision‐making. Based on survey data from Danish local government managers, the article finds that COVID‐19 decision‐making was more principled and centralised among managers working in high‐stakes policy areas and among those more actively engaged in a central crisis management team. The article theorises and empirically tests how variation in perceived stakes influences crisis decision‐making approaches.

Social Policy and Administration
VIVE - The Danish Center for Social Science Research (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Public Relations and Crisis Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.