Digital Voice as an Alternative Screening Tool to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Abstract Background The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a commonly used screening tool for cognitive impairment. Despite translation into multiple languages to facilitate broader use globally, there are inherent education and cultural biases that result in variations in cognitive screening accuracies. Acoustic voice features are emerging as a more education, language and culturally agnostic indicator of cognitive status, but as a surrogate to the MoCA has not been adequately explored. This pilot study aimed to examine the association between spectral acoustic features extracted by two functionals and MoCA total scores. Method We included 80 participants from the Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, whose responses to a picture‐description task were digitally recorded and administered the MoCA. Using openSMILE, each recording was divided into 20‐ms frames, using a sliding window that advanced by 10 ms for every segment. For each segment, we extracted 26 RASTA‐style filtered auditory spectrum (bands 1‐26) low‐level descriptors (LLD). Two functionals were applied to the 26 LLD to summarize information across each recording: the mean (mean value of LLD for all segments in each recording) and “upleveltime75” (percentage of time the signal exceeds 75% of the feature range above the minimum). Linear regression models were used to assess the association of these acoustic features with MoCA total scores, adjusting for age, sex, and education. Result Participant demographics included age: mean 68.7, SD 9.27 years; 81.25% college graduate or higher; 60.0% women. Among these participants, 29 were cognitively impaired. The mean MoCA score was 26.49 (SD = 2.54). Among the 26 upleveltime75 functional‐based spectral features, 5 showed significant negative associations with MoCA. The strongest effect was observed for band 25 (beta = –0.77, SE = 0.26, p = 0.0038). In contrast, no significant associations were observed for the acoustic features generated by the mean functional. Conclusion These results suggest that digital voice contains cognitive‐related signals and show promise as a potential globally appropriate cognitive screening tool given the ease in which it can be collected and the availability of automated open‐source tools for analysis. Further exploration analyzing voice recordings across different languages and cultural/education strata are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_106013
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital Voice as an Alternative Screening Tool to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Vijaya B. Kolachalama, R. Au, Amjad Ajam, Huitong Ding et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Digital Voice as an Alternative Screening Tool to the Montreal Cognitive Assessment

Vijaya B. Kolachalama, R. Au, Amjad Ajam, Huitong Ding, Kristi Ho, Chenglin Lyu, Zexu Li, Edward Searls, Alexa Burk, Abdulrazzaq Qattea, Xavier Serrano, Margaret Low, Owen Tan, Honghuang Lin, Katherine A. Gifford, Michael L Alosco, Eric G. Steinberg, Hamzah Anan, Jesse Mez
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) is a commonly used screening tool for cognitive impairment. Despite translation into multiple languages to facilitate broader use globally, there are inherent education and cultural biases that result in variations in cognitive screening accuracies. Acoustic voice features are emerging as a more education, language and culturally agnostic indicator of cognitive status, but as a surrogate to the MoCA has not been adequately explored. This pilot study aimed to examine the association between spectral acoustic features extracted by two functionals and MoCA total scores. Method We included 80 participants from the Boston University Alzheimer's Disease Research Center, whose responses to a picture‐description task were digitally recorded and administered the MoCA. Using openSMILE, each recording was divided into 20‐ms frames, using a sliding window that advanced by 10 ms for every segment. For each segment, we extracted 26 RASTA‐style filtered auditory spectrum (bands 1‐26) low‐level descriptors (LLD). Two functionals were applied to the 26 LLD to summarize information across each recording: the mean (mean value of LLD for all segments in each recording) and “upleveltime75” (percentage of time the signal exceeds 75% of the feature range above the minimum). Linear regression models were used to assess the association of these acoustic features with MoCA total scores, adjusting for age, sex, and education. Result Participant demographics included age: mean 68.7, SD 9.27 years; 81.25% college graduate or higher; 60.0% women. Among these participants, 29 were cognitively impaired. The mean MoCA score was 26.49 (SD = 2.54). Among the 26 upleveltime75 functional‐based spectral features, 5 showed significant negative associations with MoCA. The strongest effect was observed for band 25 (beta = –0.77, SE = 0.26, p = 0.0038). In contrast, no significant associations were observed for the acoustic features generated by the mean functional. Conclusion These results suggest that digital voice contains cognitive‐related signals and show promise as a potential globally appropriate cognitive screening tool given the ease in which it can be collected and the availability of automated open‐source tools for analysis. Further exploration analyzing voice recordings across different languages and cultural/education strata are warranted.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), Alfaisal University (SA), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.