The Architecture of AI-Trust: A Scoping Review on Conceptualizations, Trust Bases and Antecedents

The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, such as ChatGPT, has intensified the need to understand human–AI interaction, especially the role of trust. While prior research has explored individual aspects—like cognitive or emotional trust bases and various antecedents—it lacks an integrated perspective. This paper fills that gap through a scop-ing review of 57 peer-reviewed studies, developing a comprehensive framework of trust in AI. The frame-work categorizes trust antecedents into user-based, context-based, and dynamic factors, and identifies five key trust bases: cognitive, emotional, moral, institu-tional, and transitive. It also distinguishes between AI-trust conceptualizations, where AI is seen as human-like, technological, or provider-based. By unifying these elements, the study provides a holistic view of AI trust, identifies research gaps, and offers guidance for future studies to enhance both initial and ongoing user trust in AI systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/93674
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Architecture of AI-Trust: A Scoping Review on Conceptualizations, Trust Bases and Antecedents

Joséphine Banczyk, Jens Dibbern
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

The Architecture of AI-Trust: A Scoping Review on Conceptualizations, Trust Bases and Antecedents

Joséphine Banczyk, Jens Dibbern
article en

Abstract

The proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, such as ChatGPT, has intensified the need to understand human–AI interaction, especially the role of trust. While prior research has explored individual aspects—like cognitive or emotional trust bases and various antecedents—it lacks an integrated perspective. This paper fills that gap through a scop-ing review of 57 peer-reviewed studies, developing a comprehensive framework of trust in AI. The frame-work categorizes trust antecedents into user-based, context-based, and dynamic factors, and identifies five key trust bases: cognitive, emotional, moral, institu-tional, and transitive. It also distinguishes between AI-trust conceptualizations, where AI is seen as human-like, technological, or provider-based. By unifying these elements, the study provides a holistic view of AI trust, identifies research gaps, and offers guidance for future studies to enhance both initial and ongoing user trust in AI systems.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Institute of Information Engineering (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Architecture of AI-Trust: A Scoping Review on Conceptualizations, Trust Bases and Antecedents — Joséphine Banczyk, Jens Dibbern · Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS