CO₂ sequestration pathways in cementitious materials: Mechanisms, material synergies, and deployment challenges for low-carbon construction

• Comprehensive review of CO₂ sequestration in cementitious materials via accelerated carbonation curing (ACC) and mineral carbonation of alkaline by-products such as cement kiln dust (CKD). • ACC performance is typically enhanced under CO₂ concentrations ≥20%, relative humidity of 60–80%, temperatures of 20–30°C, and curing durations of 4–24 h, as reported across experimental studies. • Reactive binders (e.g., MgO), biochar additives, and FRP reinforcement enhance CO₂ uptake and durability performance. • Policy and market mechanisms are mapped to distinct CO₂ sequestration pathways to support industrial deployment and certification. The cement industry accounts for approximately 8% of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, underscoring the need for scalable in-material sequestration strategies. This study reviews current and emerging pathways for carbon dioxide sequestration in cement-based systems, focusing on process-based approaches such as accelerated carbonation curing and material-based strategies including mineral carbonation of alkaline byproducts like cement kiln dust and fly ash. The discussion is structured around three guiding questions: (1) how these approaches affect durability, strength development, and pore structure; (2) their economic feasibility and the role of enabling policy frameworks; and (3) optimal carbon dioxide incorporation levels that balance structural performance and environmental impact. Key findings include early-age strength gains from accelerated carbonation curing, pore densification with limited carbon dioxide diffusion, and corrosion risks in reinforced systems. Economic assessments estimate sequestration costs in the range of 25–56 United States dollars per metric ton of carbon dioxide, with particularly strong feasibility in precast concrete applications. Policy mechanisms such as carbon pricing, durability certification, and deployment subsidies are identified as critical enablers. Future opportunities include cast-in-place carbonation, low-purity carbon dioxide utilization, and life cycle-integrated curing strategies. By linking material science, engineering integration, and policy instruments, the paper outlines a comprehensive framework for advancing carbon-sequestering cement technologies in low-carbon construction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances
Published
2026-01-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2026.200313
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CO₂ sequestration pathways in cementitious materials: Mechanisms, material synergies, and deployment challenges for low-carbon construction

Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi, Mohammed A. Almarshoud, Qudsia Kanwal, Firas Hilaloglu
1 citations
Resources Conservation & Recycling Advances
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
19.37
article

CO₂ sequestration pathways in cementitious materials: Mechanisms, material synergies, and deployment challenges for low-carbon construction

Sami G. Al‐Ghamdi, Mohammed A. Almarshoud, Qudsia Kanwal, Firas Hilaloglu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Comprehensive review of CO₂ sequestration in cementitious materials via accelerated carbonation curing (ACC) and mineral carbonation of alkaline by-products such as cement kiln dust (CKD). • ACC performance is typically enhanced under CO₂ concentrations ≥20%, relative humidity of 60–80%, temperatures of 20–30°C, and curing durations of 4–24 h, as reported across experimental studies. • Reactive binders (e.g., MgO), biochar additives, and FRP reinforcement enhance CO₂ uptake and durability performance. • Policy and market mechanisms are mapped to distinct CO₂ sequestration pathways to support industrial deployment and certification. The cement industry accounts for approximately 8% of global anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions, underscoring the need for scalable in-material sequestration strategies. This study reviews current and emerging pathways for carbon dioxide sequestration in cement-based systems, focusing on process-based approaches such as accelerated carbonation curing and material-based strategies including mineral carbonation of alkaline byproducts like cement kiln dust and fly ash. The discussion is structured around three guiding questions: (1) how these approaches affect durability, strength development, and pore structure; (2) their economic feasibility and the role of enabling policy frameworks; and (3) optimal carbon dioxide incorporation levels that balance structural performance and environmental impact. Key findings include early-age strength gains from accelerated carbonation curing, pore densification with limited carbon dioxide diffusion, and corrosion risks in reinforced systems. Economic assessments estimate sequestration costs in the range of 25–56 United States dollars per metric ton of carbon dioxide, with particularly strong feasibility in precast concrete applications. Policy mechanisms such as carbon pricing, durability certification, and deployment subsidies are identified as critical enablers. Future opportunities include cast-in-place carbonation, low-purity carbon dioxide utilization, and life cycle-integrated curing strategies. By linking material science, engineering integration, and policy instruments, the paper outlines a comprehensive framework for advancing carbon-sequestering cement technologies in low-carbon construction.

Resources Conservation & Recycling AdvancesVol. 29
University of Jeddah (SA), King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (SA)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Concrete and Cement Materials Research
19.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.