Neoliberalizm Çağında Kamu Arazilerinin Gaspı: Türkiye’nin Yeşil Yol Projesinde Sermaye Birikiminin Hukuki ve Siyasal Mekanizmaları

This study examines land grabbing in Turkey through the Green Road Project. Introducing the concept of "public land grabbing," it argues that Turkey’s reliance on public lands in these processes and the specific public ownership regime shape the legal, institutional, and political mechanisms of land acquisitions that are realized via megaprojects. Using legal analysis, field studies, media coverage, and archival research, the study highlights three key arguments: (1) Legal amendments facilitate the commercial repurposing of public lands in the name of "public interest"; (2) Public-private partnerships enable access of capital to public lands, fostering a crony form of capital accumulation; and (3) The discourse of “public interest” serves to delegitimize oppositional movements against land grabbing and to fragment the lines of resistance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Published
2025-10-13
Primary Topic
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neoliberalizm Çağında Kamu Arazilerinin Gaspı: Türkiye’nin Yeşil Yol Projesinde Sermaye Birikiminin Hukuki ve Siyasal Mekanizmaları

Melek Mutioğlu Özkesen
DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
article

Neoliberalizm Çağında Kamu Arazilerinin Gaspı: Türkiye’nin Yeşil Yol Projesinde Sermaye Birikiminin Hukuki ve Siyasal Mekanizmaları

Melek Mutioğlu Özkesen
article en

Abstract

This study examines land grabbing in Turkey through the Green Road Project. Introducing the concept of "public land grabbing," it argues that Turkey’s reliance on public lands in these processes and the specific public ownership regime shape the legal, institutional, and political mechanisms of land acquisitions that are realized via megaprojects. Using legal analysis, field studies, media coverage, and archival research, the study highlights three key arguments: (1) Legal amendments facilitate the commercial repurposing of public lands in the name of "public interest"; (2) Public-private partnerships enable access of capital to public lands, fostering a crony form of capital accumulation; and (3) The discourse of “public interest” serves to delegitimize oppositional movements against land grabbing and to fragment the lines of resistance.

DergiPark (Istanbul University)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.