Predicting accelerated and delayed aging in global settings: biobehavioral age gaps and the role of global exposomes

Background: Global health challenges like aging and dementia are shaped by socioeconomic disparities, environmental factors, and social determinants of health. We developed a behavioral age gap (BAG), measuring the difference between expected behavioral age and chronological age Method: We utilized a cross‐sectional sample (n = 161,981) comprising countries from Latin America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Behavioral age was estimated using a Gradient Boosting Regressor with 10‐fold cross‐validation, incorporating multiple risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, female sex, visual impairment and hearing impairment) and protective factors (cognition, functional ability, education) associated with healthy aging. BAG was calculated as the difference between predicted and chronological age, and adjusted gaps were derived from the residuals of regressing BAG on chronological age. Result: Chronological age was accurately estimated using biobehavioral predictors. Key protective predictors were functional ability, education, and cognition, while main risks were hearing impairment, heart disease, and hypertension. Participants were categorized into delayed or accelerated aging groups to explore biobehavioral factors in aging. Both models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, especially for accelerated aging. BAGs varied significantly across regions and income levels, increasing from Europe to Asia, LA, and Africa. Participants from LIC displayed accelerated aging compared to HIC. Adverse exposomes were linked to accelerated aging with large effect sizes. Conclusion: This work positions BAGs as markers of aging disparities, emphasizing the influence of inequalities and exposomes, while providing measures for targeted interventions and research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting accelerated and delayed aging in global settings: biobehavioral age gaps and the role of global exposomes

Carlos Coronel‐Oliveros, Alfred Kongnyu NJAMNSHI, Maria Eugenia Godoy, Eduardo Rigon Zimmer et al.
London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
article

Predicting accelerated and delayed aging in global settings: biobehavioral age gaps and the role of global exposomes

Carlos Coronel‐Oliveros, Alfred Kongnyu NJAMNSHI, Maria Eugenia Godoy, Eduardo Rigon Zimmer, Vicente Medel, Cyprian M. Mostert, Chinedu Udeh‐Momoh, Sebastián Moguilner, Hernando A Santamaría‐García, Harris A. Eyre, Marcelo Adrián Maito, Jaime Miranda, Florencia Altschuler, Enzo Tagliazucchi, Temitope Farombi, Jhosmary Cuadros, Daniel Salazar, David A. Huepe, Zul Merali, Ahmed Shaheen, Joaquin Migeot, Agustina Legaz, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Josephine Cruzat, Pawel Swieboda, Francesca R Farina, Hernan Hernandez, Claudia Duran‐Aniotz, Pavel Prado, Liset Gonzalez, Raul Gonzalez‐Gomez, Sara Ayman Moustafa, Sol Fittipaldi, Swati Bajpai, Lucas Uglione Da Ros, Kristine Yaffe, A.B Dey, Sandra Baez, Mohamed Salama, Agustin Ibanez, Brian Lawlor
article en

Abstract

Background: Global health challenges like aging and dementia are shaped by socioeconomic disparities, environmental factors, and social determinants of health. We developed a behavioral age gap (BAG), measuring the difference between expected behavioral age and chronological age Method: We utilized a cross‐sectional sample (n = 161,981) comprising countries from Latin America, Europe, Asia, and Africa. Behavioral age was estimated using a Gradient Boosting Regressor with 10‐fold cross‐validation, incorporating multiple risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, female sex, visual impairment and hearing impairment) and protective factors (cognition, functional ability, education) associated with healthy aging. BAG was calculated as the difference between predicted and chronological age, and adjusted gaps were derived from the residuals of regressing BAG on chronological age. Result: Chronological age was accurately estimated using biobehavioral predictors. Key protective predictors were functional ability, education, and cognition, while main risks were hearing impairment, heart disease, and hypertension. Participants were categorized into delayed or accelerated aging groups to explore biobehavioral factors in aging. Both models demonstrated high predictive accuracy, especially for accelerated aging. BAGs varied significantly across regions and income levels, increasing from Europe to Asia, LA, and Africa. Participants from LIC displayed accelerated aging compared to HIC. Adverse exposomes were linked to accelerated aging with large effect sizes. Conclusion: This work positions BAGs as markers of aging disparities, emphasizing the influence of inequalities and exposomes, while providing measures for targeted interventions and research.

London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.