Tekno-milliyetçilik mi teknoloji egemenliği mi? Türkiye ve Brezilya'da MR teknolojisi geliştirme faaliyetlerinden karşılaştırmalı bulgular

This paper compares Türkiye and Brazil within a political-economy framework, analyzing how techno-nationalism and technology sovereignty strategies affect technological learning and indigenous production capabilities, specifically in MRI technology development. Rapid technological advancements and geopolitical shifts have triggered governments to reconsider industrial policies, emphasizing technological autonomy, supply chain resilience, and national security. While Türkiye's “indigenous-national” approach exhibited strong techno-nationalistic tendencies, hindering effective technological learning, Brazil's more open, collaborative strategy significantly facilitated technology transfer and indigenous capabilities. MRI technology provides an ideal context due to its complexity, strategic healthcare importance, and concentrated global market dominated by multinational corporations. The findings reveal that Türkiye’s nationalistic strategy, characterized by limited institutional alignment and global integration, constrained technological capability building. In contrast, Brazil’s strategic localization, supported by structured policy interventions and international collaboration, resulted in effective technological learning and industrial success. This research provides novel insights by examining Türkiye’s hybrid strategy (indigenous-national), an area rarely explored comparatively in existing literature, thus enriching discussions on technology sovereignty and techno-nationalism in emerging economies.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tekno-milliyetçilik mi teknoloji egemenliği mi? Türkiye ve Brezilya'da MR teknolojisi geliştirme faaliyetlerinden karşılaştırmalı bulgular

İbrahim Semih Akçomak, Ceren Yavuz
OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

Tekno-milliyetçilik mi teknoloji egemenliği mi? Türkiye ve Brezilya'da MR teknolojisi geliştirme faaliyetlerinden karşılaştırmalı bulgular

İbrahim Semih Akçomak, Ceren Yavuz
article en

Abstract

This paper compares Türkiye and Brazil within a political-economy framework, analyzing how techno-nationalism and technology sovereignty strategies affect technological learning and indigenous production capabilities, specifically in MRI technology development. Rapid technological advancements and geopolitical shifts have triggered governments to reconsider industrial policies, emphasizing technological autonomy, supply chain resilience, and national security. While Türkiye's “indigenous-national” approach exhibited strong techno-nationalistic tendencies, hindering effective technological learning, Brazil's more open, collaborative strategy significantly facilitated technology transfer and indigenous capabilities. MRI technology provides an ideal context due to its complexity, strategic healthcare importance, and concentrated global market dominated by multinational corporations. The findings reveal that Türkiye’s nationalistic strategy, characterized by limited institutional alignment and global integration, constrained technological capability building. In contrast, Brazil’s strategic localization, supported by structured policy interventions and international collaboration, resulted in effective technological learning and industrial success. This research provides novel insights by examining Türkiye’s hybrid strategy (indigenous-national), an area rarely explored comparatively in existing literature, thus enriching discussions on technology sovereignty and techno-nationalism in emerging economies.

OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.