Long plane trees

In the longest plane spanning tree problem, we are given a finite planar point set ${mathcal P}$, and our task is to find a plane (i.e., noncrossing) spanning tree for ${mathcal P}$ with maximum total Euclidean edge length. Despite more than two decades of research, it remains open whether this problem is NP-hard. Thus, previous results have focused on polynomial-time algorithms that produce plane trees whose total edge length approximates $text{OPT}$, the maximum possible length. The approximate trees in these algorithms all have small unweighted diameter, typically two to four. It is natural to ask whether this is a common feature of longest plane spanning trees, or an artifact of the specific approximation algorithms. We provide three results to elucidate the interplay between the approximation guarantee and the unweighted diameter of the approximate trees. First, we describe a polynomial-time algorithm to construct a plane tree with diameter at most four and total edge length at least $0.546cdottext{OPT}$. This constitutes a substantial improvement over the state of the art. Second, we show that a longest plane tree among those with diameter at most three can be found in polynomial time. Third, for any candidate diameter $d ge 3$, we provide upper bounds on the approximation factor that can be achieved by a longest plane tree with diameter at most $d$ (compared to a longest plane tree without constraints).

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Published
2026-01-01
Primary Topic
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long plane trees

Sergio Cabello, Katharina Klost, Wolfgang Mulzer, Josef Tkadlec et al.
Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
article

Long plane trees

Sergio Cabello, Katharina Klost, Wolfgang Mulzer, Josef Tkadlec, Michael Hoffmann
article en

Abstract

In the longest plane spanning tree problem, we are given a finite planar point set ${mathcal P}$, and our task is to find a plane (i.e., noncrossing) spanning tree for ${mathcal P}$ with maximum total Euclidean edge length. Despite more than two decades of research, it remains open whether this problem is NP-hard. Thus, previous results have focused on polynomial-time algorithms that produce plane trees whose total edge length approximates $text{OPT}$, the maximum possible length. The approximate trees in these algorithms all have small unweighted diameter, typically two to four. It is natural to ask whether this is a common feature of longest plane spanning trees, or an artifact of the specific approximation algorithms. We provide three results to elucidate the interplay between the approximation guarantee and the unweighted diameter of the approximate trees. First, we describe a polynomial-time algorithm to construct a plane tree with diameter at most four and total edge length at least $0.546cdottext{OPT}$. This constitutes a substantial improvement over the state of the art. Second, we show that a longest plane tree among those with diameter at most three can be found in polynomial time. Third, for any candidate diameter $d ge 3$, we provide upper bounds on the approximation factor that can be achieved by a longest plane tree with diameter at most $d$ (compared to a longest plane tree without constraints).

Repository of the University of Ljubljana (University of Ljubljana)
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.