Consensus for Integrating the Point-of-Care Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT) into Sexually Transmitted Infection Management Guidelines: Results from a Two-Round Modified Delphi Survey.

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) are frequently asymptomatic in women. They cause genital inflammation and can increase transmission and acquisition of HIV. GIFT (Genital InFlammation Test) is a novel, point-of-care (POC) device under development for detecting genital inflammation in women. We aimed to obtain consensus to inform the development of GIFT and its integration into management guidelines. Methods: We employed a Delphi technique through two rounds of online surveys. Respondents included service providers, health programmers, researchers, and policy makers. Round one questions generated ideas, and round two built consensus on the strategies from round one. Survey sections included demographics, implementation of the test, integration into current guidelines and purpose. Round two survey employed a five-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Consensus was reached if ≥70% of participants selected strongly agree or agree. Results: We received 28 to the first and 68 to the second round. From both rounds, participants were healthcare providers (41%) or researchers (26%), residing in Africa (57%), Europe (21%) and America (10%). Most participants agreed that GIFT should be used as a screening tool to be followed by confirmatory STI testing before treatment: 75% (round 1), 69% ( round 2). There was consensus that populations to benefit most from GIFT were young asymptomatic women (16-24 years) in high HIV prevalence settings, and high-risk women like female sex workers and those with multiple partners of any age. Attributes of GIFT ranked as most important included ease-of-use, stability at room temperature, high diagnostic accuracy and barriers were test stock-outs, complexity of use and high cost, Conclusion: While the Delphi process suggests the purpose of GIFT is as a POC screening tool, factors like supply chain, storage and stakeholder engagement are crucial for its integration into management guidelines.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)
Published
2025-12-09
Primary Topic
Reproductive tract infections research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consensus for Integrating the Point-of-Care Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT) into Sexually Transmitted Infection Management Guidelines: Results from a Two-Round Modified Delphi Survey.

Tania Crucitti, J A Passmore, S Francis, L Masson et al.
LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)
Reproductive tract infections research
article

Consensus for Integrating the Point-of-Care Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT) into Sexually Transmitted Infection Management Guidelines: Results from a Two-Round Modified Delphi Survey.

Tania Crucitti, J A Passmore, S Francis, L Masson, E E Kpokiri, E Harding-Esch, J HHM van de Wijgert, C Mackworth-young
article en

Abstract

Background: Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and bacterial vaginosis (BV) are frequently asymptomatic in women. They cause genital inflammation and can increase transmission and acquisition of HIV. GIFT (Genital InFlammation Test) is a novel, point-of-care (POC) device under development for detecting genital inflammation in women. We aimed to obtain consensus to inform the development of GIFT and its integration into management guidelines. Methods: We employed a Delphi technique through two rounds of online surveys. Respondents included service providers, health programmers, researchers, and policy makers. Round one questions generated ideas, and round two built consensus on the strategies from round one. Survey sections included demographics, implementation of the test, integration into current guidelines and purpose. Round two survey employed a five-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Consensus was reached if ≥70% of participants selected strongly agree or agree. Results: We received 28 to the first and 68 to the second round. From both rounds, participants were healthcare providers (41%) or researchers (26%), residing in Africa (57%), Europe (21%) and America (10%). Most participants agreed that GIFT should be used as a screening tool to be followed by confirmatory STI testing before treatment: 75% (round 1), 69% ( round 2). There was consensus that populations to benefit most from GIFT were young asymptomatic women (16-24 years) in high HIV prevalence settings, and high-risk women like female sex workers and those with multiple partners of any age. Attributes of GIFT ranked as most important included ease-of-use, stability at room temperature, high diagnostic accuracy and barriers were test stock-outs, complexity of use and high cost, Conclusion: While the Delphi process suggests the purpose of GIFT is as a POC screening tool, factors like supply chain, storage and stakeholder engagement are crucial for its integration into management guidelines.

LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Reproductive tract infections research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Consensus for Integrating the Point-of-Care Genital InFlammation Test (GIFT) into Sexually Transmitted Infection Management Guidelines: Results from a Two-Round Modified Delphi Survey. — Tania Crucitti, J A Passmore, et al. · LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS