Developing programme theories to address unmet needs of people experiencing homelessness and severe mental illness: protocol for a realist review

<ns3:p>Introduction People experiencing both homelessness and severe mental illness have complex needs requiring coordinated multi-sectoral and multilevel interventions. Several systematic reviews of interventions exist internationally; however, evidence on the mechanism of change and contextual factors is limited. The proposed realist review aims to synthesize evidence to understand what interventions work, how, why, for whom, and under what circumstances in low and middle-income country settings. Methods This work is nested within the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Group on Homelessness and Mental Health in Africa (HOPE) project in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Kenya. In HOPE, we use participatory methods to develop and evaluate community-based interventions to address the unmet needs of people who are homeless and have severe mental illness living in the three countries. This protocol details the methodology for a realist review to inform the development, testing, and refinement of a programme theory for intervention. The review will follow five iterative steps. Step 1: Clarify the review scope and develop initial programme theories (IPTs). Step 2: Search for evidence across electronic databases and hand search for published studies to test and refine the IPTs. Step 3: Select and appraise studies. Step 4: Extract data, Step 5: Analyse and synthesize extracted data. The IPTs will be supplemented with formal theories to enhance their explanatory power. Key stakeholders will give critical inputs throughout the review process. Discussion The findings of the realist review will inform the development of contextually relevant programme theories to address the unmet needs of people who are homeless and have severe mental illness in LMICs, which will then be tested and refined within a realist evaluation. PROSPERO registration: CRD420251067136</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
NIHR Open Research
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.14151.1
Primary Topic
Homelessness and Social Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing programme theories to address unmet needs of people experiencing homelessness and severe mental illness: protocol for a realist review

Laura Asher, Peter Badimak Yaro, Ribka Birhanu, Eleni Misganaw et al.
NIHR Open Research
Homelessness and Social Issues
article

Developing programme theories to address unmet needs of people experiencing homelessness and severe mental illness: protocol for a realist review

Laura Asher, Peter Badimak Yaro, Ribka Birhanu, Eleni Misganaw, Caroline Smartt, Rosie Mayston, Victoria Mutiso, Ursula M. Read, Cecilia Ashaley Fofo, A. Alem, Kimberly Kariuki, Hasset Chenu, Tizaa Hannan Legend, Sisay Abayneh, Charlotte Hanlon, Faith Mukami
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Introduction People experiencing both homelessness and severe mental illness have complex needs requiring coordinated multi-sectoral and multilevel interventions. Several systematic reviews of interventions exist internationally; however, evidence on the mechanism of change and contextual factors is limited. The proposed realist review aims to synthesize evidence to understand what interventions work, how, why, for whom, and under what circumstances in low and middle-income country settings. Methods This work is nested within the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Global Health Research Group on Homelessness and Mental Health in Africa (HOPE) project in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Kenya. In HOPE, we use participatory methods to develop and evaluate community-based interventions to address the unmet needs of people who are homeless and have severe mental illness living in the three countries. This protocol details the methodology for a realist review to inform the development, testing, and refinement of a programme theory for intervention. The review will follow five iterative steps. Step 1: Clarify the review scope and develop initial programme theories (IPTs). Step 2: Search for evidence across electronic databases and hand search for published studies to test and refine the IPTs. Step 3: Select and appraise studies. Step 4: Extract data, Step 5: Analyse and synthesize extracted data. The IPTs will be supplemented with formal theories to enhance their explanatory power. Key stakeholders will give critical inputs throughout the review process. Discussion The findings of the realist review will inform the development of contextually relevant programme theories to address the unmet needs of people who are homeless and have severe mental illness in LMICs, which will then be tested and refined within a realist evaluation. PROSPERO registration: CRD420251067136</ns3:p>

NIHR Open ResearchVol. 6
University of Essex (GB), University of Ghana (GH), University of Nottingham (GB), King's College - North Carolina (US), King's College London (GB), Kenya Medical Research Institute (KE), Institute of Mental Health (GB), Ethiopian Public Health Association (ET), Africa Mental Health Foundation (KE), Under Armour (United States) (US), Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre (GB), South African Brain Research Institute (ZA), Addis Ababa University (ET), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, Public Health England, Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Homelessness and Social Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.