Expandable Cage Versus Mesh Cage for the Treatment of Vertebral Osteomyelitis

Background and objective Consensus regarding the optimal method for anterior column reconstruction in vertebral osteomyelitis has not been established. Direct comparisons between mesh and expandable cages have not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes, including revision rates, recurrence rates, complications, and costs, between these two reconstruction methods, as well as to identify independent risk factors for treatment failure in patients undergoing anterior column reconstruction with metal implants. Methods Clinical records of consecutive patients who underwent surgical intervention for vertebral osteomyelitis at a single institution between 2012 and April 2024 were reviewed. Patients who underwent anterior column debridement with either a mesh or an expandable cage, along with posterior fusion involving four or more levels, were included. Clinical outcomes, including nonunion, revisions, recurrence, and costs, were compared between the mesh and expandable cage groups. Results Ninety-two patients were included: 20 (22%) in the expandable cage group and 72 (78%) in the mesh cage group. The expandable cage group had a significantly higher nonunion rate (35% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.014) and revision rate (30% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.032). Costs were also higher in the expandable cage group, with a significant difference in in-hospital costs (Expandable: $77,737 ± 34,586; Mesh: $63,250 ± 27,899; p = 0.028). Multivariable analysis identified the number of fused levels (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.05-1.71; p = 0.024) and the use of an expandable cage (OR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.04-11.02; p = 0.046) as independent risk factors for treatment failure, defined as revision surgery, recurrence, or mortality. Conclusions This study is the first to compare outcomes between expandable cages and mesh cages in patients with vertebral osteomyelitis. The findings suggest that the use of an expandable cage for reconstruction after anterior column debridement is associated with higher costs and increased risks of nonunion and revision surgery compared with mesh cages. Additionally, the use of an expandable cage was identified as an independent risk factor for treatment failure in vertebral osteomyelitis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.100922
Primary Topic
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expandable Cage Versus Mesh Cage for the Treatment of Vertebral Osteomyelitis

Mladen Djurasovic, Steven D. Glassman, Charles H. Crawford, John R. Dimar et al.
Cureus
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
article

Expandable Cage Versus Mesh Cage for the Treatment of Vertebral Osteomyelitis

Mladen Djurasovic, Steven D. Glassman, Charles H. Crawford, John R. Dimar, Mitsuhiro Nishizawa, Leah Y. Carreon, Benjamin Kostic
article en

Abstract

Background and objective Consensus regarding the optimal method for anterior column reconstruction in vertebral osteomyelitis has not been established. Direct comparisons between mesh and expandable cages have not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate differences in clinical outcomes, including revision rates, recurrence rates, complications, and costs, between these two reconstruction methods, as well as to identify independent risk factors for treatment failure in patients undergoing anterior column reconstruction with metal implants. Methods Clinical records of consecutive patients who underwent surgical intervention for vertebral osteomyelitis at a single institution between 2012 and April 2024 were reviewed. Patients who underwent anterior column debridement with either a mesh or an expandable cage, along with posterior fusion involving four or more levels, were included. Clinical outcomes, including nonunion, revisions, recurrence, and costs, were compared between the mesh and expandable cage groups. Results Ninety-two patients were included: 20 (22%) in the expandable cage group and 72 (78%) in the mesh cage group. The expandable cage group had a significantly higher nonunion rate (35% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.014) and revision rate (30% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.032). Costs were also higher in the expandable cage group, with a significant difference in in-hospital costs (Expandable: $77,737 ± 34,586; Mesh: $63,250 ± 27,899; p = 0.028). Multivariable analysis identified the number of fused levels (OR = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.05-1.71; p = 0.024) and the use of an expandable cage (OR = 3.27, 95% CI: 1.04-11.02; p = 0.046) as independent risk factors for treatment failure, defined as revision surgery, recurrence, or mortality. Conclusions This study is the first to compare outcomes between expandable cages and mesh cages in patients with vertebral osteomyelitis. The findings suggest that the use of an expandable cage for reconstruction after anterior column debridement is associated with higher costs and increased risks of nonunion and revision surgery compared with mesh cages. Additionally, the use of an expandable cage was identified as an independent risk factor for treatment failure in vertebral osteomyelitis.

CureusVol. 18(1)
University of Louisville (US), Norton Healthcare (US), University of Louisville Hospital (US), University of Louisville Physicians (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 94%
Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.