A ‘Lost’ Reading of <i>Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī</i> Reconstructed: A Study of Al-Nasafī’s Recension of the <i>Ṣaḥīḥ</i>

Abstract Marked by a multitude of recensions and sub-recensions, the transmission history of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī is notably complex and the subject of extensive study. Since its extant version traces back to one source, that is, al-Bukhārī’s student Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-Farabrī (d. 320 ah), our understanding of the Ṣaḥīḥ is largely limited to what his recension has to offer. By reconstructing an inextant primary recension of the Ṣaḥīḥ, specifically that of Ibrāhīm b. Maʿqil al-Nasafī (d. 295 ah), this paper provides an alternative perspective that sheds light on the structure, variations, and evolution of the Ṣaḥīḥ. Despite the absence of a manuscript for al-Nasafī’s recension, numerous variants documented in secondary sources make it possible to enable its reconstruction. The findings of this study reveal notable variances in the text, chapter headings, exegetical content, and authorial comments between al-Farabrī’s and al-Nasafī’s respective recensions, highlighting the idiosyncrasies of al-Nasafī’s recension and what they tell us about the provenance and posthumous transmission of the Ṣaḥīḥ.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Islamic Studies
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jis/etaf050
Primary Topic
Islamic Studies and History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A ‘Lost’ Reading of Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī Reconstructed: A Study of Al-Nasafī’s Recension of the Ṣaḥīḥ

Muntasir Zaman
Journal of Islamic Studies
Islamic Studies and History
article

A ‘Lost’ Reading of Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī Reconstructed: A Study of Al-Nasafī’s Recension of the Ṣaḥīḥ

Muntasir Zaman
article en

Abstract

Abstract Marked by a multitude of recensions and sub-recensions, the transmission history of Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī is notably complex and the subject of extensive study. Since its extant version traces back to one source, that is, al-Bukhārī’s student Muḥammad b. Yūsuf al-Farabrī (d. 320 ah), our understanding of the Ṣaḥīḥ is largely limited to what his recension has to offer. By reconstructing an inextant primary recension of the Ṣaḥīḥ, specifically that of Ibrāhīm b. Maʿqil al-Nasafī (d. 295 ah), this paper provides an alternative perspective that sheds light on the structure, variations, and evolution of the Ṣaḥīḥ. Despite the absence of a manuscript for al-Nasafī’s recension, numerous variants documented in secondary sources make it possible to enable its reconstruction. The findings of this study reveal notable variances in the text, chapter headings, exegetical content, and authorial comments between al-Farabrī’s and al-Nasafī’s respective recensions, highlighting the idiosyncrasies of al-Nasafī’s recension and what they tell us about the provenance and posthumous transmission of the Ṣaḥīḥ.

Journal of Islamic Studies
Western Seminary (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Islamic Studies and History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.