Nietzsche and MacIntyre? Nietzsche’s Value for Neo-Aristotelianism Reconsidered

Alasdair MacIntyre argues that we face a choice: Nietzsche or Aristotle. Either we side with Nietzsche and his insight that the will to power is all that remains of morality in liberal modernity, or we try to recover the Aristotelian tradition of the virtues. This article forges a new relation between Nietzsche and MacIntyre by exploring alternative readings of Nietzsche that make him an important interlocutor. I argue that we can plausibly read Nietzsche as a eudaimonist and perfectionist, making him into something of an ally with insightsthat are of deep significance to MacIntyre and the broader neo-Aristotelian revival. Nietzsche’s value for neo-Aristotelians lies especially in his reflections on the loss of God and what that tells us about the contingency, complexity, and conflicts of human life. They flow from his sense that the world is a complex mess; that the old certainties upon which used to rely, such as God or Reason, have gone; and that every individual human life and every society involves genuine and tragic loss.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Ethics
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10892-025-09547-3
Primary Topic
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Nietzsche and MacIntyre? Nietzsche’s Value for Neo-Aristotelianism Reconsidered

Marijn Nohlmans
The Journal of Ethics
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
article

Nietzsche and MacIntyre? Nietzsche’s Value for Neo-Aristotelianism Reconsidered

Marijn Nohlmans
article en

Abstract

Alasdair MacIntyre argues that we face a choice: Nietzsche or Aristotle. Either we side with Nietzsche and his insight that the will to power is all that remains of morality in liberal modernity, or we try to recover the Aristotelian tradition of the virtues. This article forges a new relation between Nietzsche and MacIntyre by exploring alternative readings of Nietzsche that make him an important interlocutor. I argue that we can plausibly read Nietzsche as a eudaimonist and perfectionist, making him into something of an ally with insightsthat are of deep significance to MacIntyre and the broader neo-Aristotelian revival. Nietzsche’s value for neo-Aristotelians lies especially in his reflections on the loss of God and what that tells us about the contingency, complexity, and conflicts of human life. They flow from his sense that the world is a complex mess; that the old certainties upon which used to rely, such as God or Reason, have gone; and that every individual human life and every society involves genuine and tragic loss.

The Journal of Ethics
University of Chicago (US)
Princeton University, University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 93%
Philosophical Ethics and Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Nietzsche and MacIntyre? Nietzsche’s Value for Neo-Aristotelianism Reconsidered — Marijn Nohlmans · The Journal of Ethics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS